2011
DOI: 10.1002/cb.364
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conspicuous consumption orientation: Conceptualisation, scale development and validation

Abstract: In this paper individual differences in conspicuous tendencies are examined. A new definition of the construct is proposed and, through critical evaluation of the extant literature, the need for a proper scale is posited. Then an extensive exercise is taken up to develop and validate the scale. The 11-item scale is found to be uni-dimensional, to have a factor structure that is generalisable across student and nonstudent samples, and has acceptable internal and test-retest reliabilities. The scale's validity i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
107
1
7

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 143 publications
(127 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
5
107
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Participants responded to each statement of the scales ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree). Then participants were instructed to report their conspicuous consumption orientation via the scale developed by Chaudhuri, Mazumdar and Ghoshal (; α = 0.86, M = 5.09, SD = 0.99) which consists of eleven items, such as “I buy some products because I want to show others that I am wealthy,” “It says something to people around me when I buy a high priced brand,” “I buy some products because I want to show others that I am wealthy” and “Given a chance, I would hang a Hussain painting in drawing my room” and no items are reverse‐scored.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Participants responded to each statement of the scales ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree). Then participants were instructed to report their conspicuous consumption orientation via the scale developed by Chaudhuri, Mazumdar and Ghoshal (; α = 0.86, M = 5.09, SD = 0.99) which consists of eleven items, such as “I buy some products because I want to show others that I am wealthy,” “It says something to people around me when I buy a high priced brand,” “I buy some products because I want to show others that I am wealthy” and “Given a chance, I would hang a Hussain painting in drawing my room” and no items are reverse‐scored.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We measured dispositions to experience other positive emotions in order to identify the effect of awe on the inclination of conspicuous consumption (Piff et al, ). Then, participants reported their inclination of conspicuous consumption (Chaudhuri, Mazumdar, & Ghoshal, ).…”
Section: Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conspicuous consumption has been found to be influenced by individualism, social visibility, and need for uniqueness (Chaudhuri, Mazumdar, & Ghoshal, ; Giovannini et al., ; Kastanakis & Balabanis, ). This research suggests that individualists may be more concerned with self‐enhancement to demonstrate their uniqueness (snob effect), while collectivists may be more concerned with fitting in with others (bandwagon effect).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For Study 2, we recruited 102 participants (40 females, M age = 31.76; SD age = 9.89) from the same population as that used for the pretest (i.e., Amazon Mechanical Turk). Participants first rated their conspicuous consumption orientation through 11 items (e.g., “It says something to people around me when I buy a high priced brand,” “I buy some products because I want to show others that I am wealthy”) measured through seven‐point Likert scales (1 = strongly disagree, 7 = strongly agree) drawn from Chaudhuri et al (). Afterward, participants were randomly assigned to one of two experimental scenarios—namely, the description of the wallet using either a hedonic or utilitarian message appeal.…”
Section: Study 2: the Moderating Of Role Of Conspicuous Consumption Omentioning
confidence: 99%