2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11002-015-9350-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conspicuous consumption and income inequality in an emerging economy: evidence from India

Abstract: The impact of income inequality on conspicuous consumption has been a topic of much discussion, but little empirical examination in the emerging market context. In this paper, using data from the India Human Development Survey (2004)(2005) and employing simple regression framework, we examine the effect of income inequality on conspicuous consumption in Indian households. We also empirically examine whether the relationship between inequality and conspicuous consumption changes with a household's relative weal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
39
1
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
39
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Income for income, people are more likely to buy highstatus cars in more unequal U.S. counties (Bricker, Ramcharan, & Krimmel, 2014). Nor is the effect of inequality on status consumption confined to the richer countries (Jaikumar & Sarin, 2015). As well as increases in conspicuous consumption, there is also evidence that inequality increases debt and bankruptcies (Iacoviello, 2008;Levine, Frank, & Dijk, 2010).…”
Section: Status Becomes More Importantmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Income for income, people are more likely to buy highstatus cars in more unequal U.S. counties (Bricker, Ramcharan, & Krimmel, 2014). Nor is the effect of inequality on status consumption confined to the richer countries (Jaikumar & Sarin, 2015). As well as increases in conspicuous consumption, there is also evidence that inequality increases debt and bankruptcies (Iacoviello, 2008;Levine, Frank, & Dijk, 2010).…”
Section: Status Becomes More Importantmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, previous research suggests that lower levels of conspicuous consumption orientation typically characterize consumers with an internalized approach to luxury, while higher levels of those same traits typically characterize consumers with an externalized approach to luxury (Chaudhuri, Mazumdar, & Ghoshal, 2011;Eastman, Iyer, Shepherd, Heugel, & Faulk, 2018;Fuchs, Prandelli, Schreier, & Dahl, 2013;Jaikumar & Sarin, 2015;Wang & Griskevicius, 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, [30,34] have reported that the poor spend more on status consumption and invest less in human capital, as an answer to their feelings of relative deprivation. Moreover, [29] have shown that conspicuous goods can serve as a substitute for educational qualifications and professional titles. It gives the highly educated ones, those who have an observable ability displayed by professional titles, degrees certificates and diplomas, to have relatively little need to signal success, while those without education and thus without certified accomplishment to have stronger motive to impress others by spending on conspicuous goods and services [50] On the contrary, [1,15,52] have reported that higher levels of education generally bring higher access to financial resources and a stronger need to signal the achieved wealth, status and prestige [33].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%