2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00265-019-2651-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conspecific presence and microhabitat features influence foraging decisions across ontogeny in a facultatively social mammal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Confirmation of predictions of the shared physiological correlates hypothesis will require future work in this system with larger sample sizes, experimental manipulations, and repeated measures of both FGMs and venom resistance within individuals. Such studies may reveal an additional key context for hormonal integration of anti-snake defenses, such as distance from refuges (e.g., burrows, [ 67 ]), availability of promontories (e.g., elevated rocks or logs, [ 68 ]), foraging group size [ 60 ], and the presence of genetic relatives [ 69 ] or other safety cues [ 70 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Confirmation of predictions of the shared physiological correlates hypothesis will require future work in this system with larger sample sizes, experimental manipulations, and repeated measures of both FGMs and venom resistance within individuals. Such studies may reveal an additional key context for hormonal integration of anti-snake defenses, such as distance from refuges (e.g., burrows, [ 67 ]), availability of promontories (e.g., elevated rocks or logs, [ 68 ]), foraging group size [ 60 ], and the presence of genetic relatives [ 69 ] or other safety cues [ 70 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exposure to snakes exerts selection to maintain these potentially costly defensive traits: squirrels in areas with high rattlesnake densities express the most effective behavioral and physiological defenses [ 42 , 56 ], and adults express more effective behavioral and physiological defenses than juveniles [ 3 , 55 , 60 ]. For example, even though tail-flagging is a snake-specific display that deters snakes from striking [ 1 ], squirrels adapted to high levels of rattlesnake predation tend to exhibit lower signaling rates, spend less time engaging snakes, and are more hesitant to approach snakes closely than squirrels from areas with low rattlesnake densities (“nonadapted” to snakes) [ 53 , 55 , 61 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is to be expected given the greater vulnerability of a single individual to predation and has been extensively documented in other studies. [35][36][37] Furthermore, though food density was not measured in the study area, birds on land tended to be in larger flocks compared to water, thus increasing scramble competition. This could have also minimized the strength of the association between vigilance and flock size.…”
Section: Flock Sizementioning
confidence: 95%
“…Overall, overlap tended to be greater between an individual's second and third years on the study site, suggesting that animals became more spatially consistent over time. Individuals first captured as subadults overlapped more with themselves than did animals first captured as adults, indicating that age may contribute to individual patterns of space use (Rayor and Armitage 1991;Salvioni and Lidicker 1995;Ortiz et al 2019). Variation in between-years overlap may also reflect differences in dispersal history (Murray 1982;Nelson and Mech 1984;Costello 2010).…”
Section: Variation In Spatial Relationshipsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, individuals may vary in their tendency to associate with conspecifics (Lott 1984(Lott , 1991, resulting in some animals that consistently live alone while others consistently live in groups, regardless of ecological or demographic conditions. Variation in social relationships may also occur if individuals alter their behavior to better capitalize on the relative fitness benefits of different social options (Rehan et al 2014;Ortiz et al 2019). Finally, variation in social relationships may reflect stochastic demographic factors such as recruitment or mortality, each of which may influence the number of conspecifics with which an individual lives (Blumstein 2013;Hatchwell et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%