1992
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-1591(05)80086-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conspecific discrimination and social preference in the laying hen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results agreed with those of Dawkins (1983) using a behavioural demand approach that showed that although hens preferred litter to wire floors, their preference for litter was not strong enough to outweigh the attraction of food. While some studies have indicated that domestic hens have a strong preference to be near familiar hens over unfamiliar hens (Hughes 1977;Bradshaw 1992), the strength of the preference for social contact has not been studied. However, if, as mentioned earlier, food is generally assumed to generate the maximal response or preference in most cases (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results agreed with those of Dawkins (1983) using a behavioural demand approach that showed that although hens preferred litter to wire floors, their preference for litter was not strong enough to outweigh the attraction of food. While some studies have indicated that domestic hens have a strong preference to be near familiar hens over unfamiliar hens (Hughes 1977;Bradshaw 1992), the strength of the preference for social contact has not been studied. However, if, as mentioned earlier, food is generally assumed to generate the maximal response or preference in most cases (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The classic example is in studies of individual, kin or species discrimination, where different unconditional responses may be made to images of apparently similar objects (e.g. Bradshaw, 1992;Guzman & Marin, 2008;Hansen, Johannessen & Slagsvold, 2008), or an unconditional response may be habituated to exemplars of one set of images, and then dishabituation can be seen when an exemplar of a different category is presented.…”
Section: What Can Picture Set Discrimination Tell Us About How Birds mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In birds, the ability to discriminate between familiar and unfamiliar conspecifics has been the subject of numerous studies (Bradshaw, 1991(Bradshaw, , 1992Dawkins, 1996;Hauser & Huber-Eicher, 2004;Ryan & Lea, 1994;Väisänen & Jensen, 2004). Nonetheless, the influence of factors which may affect individual discrimination, such as social motivation (i.e., the motivation to seek close proximity with conspecifics), age and duration of contact have rarely been investigated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%