2004
DOI: 10.7771/2380-176x.4288
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consortial Circulation via Patron Placed Holds in the USMAI's Shared Catalog and its Impact on Collection Development and ILL

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…She found that titles purchased to fill an ILL request or to support long holds queues saw much larger circulation than their traditional acquisitions counterparts. A more recent study showed the impact on the combined collection development budgets of a consortium of using holds to manage requests for books at other institutions (Ferguson, Flinchbaugh, & Moskal, 2013). While there is some discussion on how the holdings of other consortial partners impacted their decision to purchase a title or not, there was no mention of how the consortium handled heavily requested items or if multiple copies of the same title were ever purchased by the same institution.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…She found that titles purchased to fill an ILL request or to support long holds queues saw much larger circulation than their traditional acquisitions counterparts. A more recent study showed the impact on the combined collection development budgets of a consortium of using holds to manage requests for books at other institutions (Ferguson, Flinchbaugh, & Moskal, 2013). While there is some discussion on how the holdings of other consortial partners impacted their decision to purchase a title or not, there was no mention of how the consortium handled heavily requested items or if multiple copies of the same title were ever purchased by the same institution.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 97%