1995
DOI: 10.1016/0024-3841(95)90099-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consonant clusters and phonological syllables in French

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
76
0
9

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
4
76
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…This agrees with Dell's (1995) analysis of the French syllable (see also Bouchard 1980). Plénat (1987) also proposes that rimes consist maximally of two positions, but he assumes that the two rime slots can be occupied by sonorants only.…”
Section: The French Syllablesupporting
confidence: 87%
“…This agrees with Dell's (1995) analysis of the French syllable (see also Bouchard 1980). Plénat (1987) also proposes that rimes consist maximally of two positions, but he assumes that the two rime slots can be occupied by sonorants only.…”
Section: The French Syllablesupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The only clusters unanimously considered as nonseparable consisted of a subset of the OBstruent-LIquid clusters. This subset, referred to as the OBLI class by Dell (1995), includes the combinations of a stop or the fricative /f/ or /v/ with the liquid // or /l/, excluding /dl and tl/ clusters, illegal at word onset. In the misaligned condition, the OBLI clusters consisted of /d/, /f/, /k/, /p/, /t/, and /v/ for the 21 targets beginning with // and /bl/, /fl/, /kl/, and /gl/ for those beginning with /l/.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ç-a and ≈a-rnab-aat. French does have phonotactic constraints (see Dell 1995), but this difference does not explain why ZT makes so few metatheses on French clusters. Some French clusters would be reversible without changing the syllable structure (e.g., kt, tl, where the structure is C.C in both orders), whereas some other clusters would be reversible with a concomitant change in syllable structure (e.g., rk, rt, where the structure is C.C in one order and .CC in the other).…”
Section: The Irrelevance Of Phonotactic and Syllabic Constraints Let mentioning
confidence: 99%