1996
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9399(1996)122:11(1077)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consolidation of Elastic Porous Media Saturated by Two Immiscible Fluids

Abstract: A theory is presented to simulate the consolidation of elastic porous media saturated by two immiscible Newtonian fluids. The macroscopic equations, including mass and momentum balance equations and constitutive relations, are obtained by volume averaging the microscale equations. The theory is based on the small deformation assumption. In the microscale, the grains are assumed to be linearly elastic and the fluids are Newtonian. The bulk and shear moduli of the solid matrix are introduced to obtain the macros… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, the relative saturation of air S 1 in the current configuration is determined by S1=S10+normalΔS1 where S 1 0 is the relative saturation of air in the reference configuration and Δ S 1 = S 1 − S 1 0 is the difference in the relative saturation of air evaluated between the current and reference configurations. The latter, of course, is a function of capillary pressure (Tuncay and Corapcioglu 1996; Lo et al, 2005): normalΔS1=normaldS1normaldpc(p1p2) where p c = p 1 − p 2 is the capillary pressure; d S 1 /d p c expresses the slope (evaluated in the reference configuration) of the curve relating capillary pressure to the relative saturation of air (or water since S 1 = 1 − S 2 ), i.e., the water retention curve. As shown in the appendix, the elasticity coefficients a ij depend on this slope.…”
Section: Poroelasticity Theory Of Consolidationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For instance, the relative saturation of air S 1 in the current configuration is determined by S1=S10+normalΔS1 where S 1 0 is the relative saturation of air in the reference configuration and Δ S 1 = S 1 − S 1 0 is the difference in the relative saturation of air evaluated between the current and reference configurations. The latter, of course, is a function of capillary pressure (Tuncay and Corapcioglu 1996; Lo et al, 2005): normalΔS1=normaldS1normaldpc(p1p2) where p c = p 1 − p 2 is the capillary pressure; d S 1 /d p c expresses the slope (evaluated in the reference configuration) of the curve relating capillary pressure to the relative saturation of air (or water since S 1 = 1 − S 2 ), i.e., the water retention curve. As shown in the appendix, the elasticity coefficients a ij depend on this slope.…”
Section: Poroelasticity Theory Of Consolidationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This kind of diffusive coupling also appears in the consolidation theories developed by Fredlund et al (2012, Eq. [16.17] and [16.36]) using continuity equations and by Tuncay and Corapcioglu (1996, Eq. [74] and [75]) using the technique of volume averaging.…”
Section: Poroelasticity Theory Of Consolidationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This conceptual breakthrough was achieved later by Biot (1941), who brought the role of the solid and fluid constituents on equal footing to formulate a pair of coupled equilibrium equations of motion using the displacement vector of solid and fluid pore pressure as dependent vari-ables, now known as poroelasticity. Tuncay and Corapcioglu (1996) used volume-average theory to simulate the consolidation problem of poroelastic media saturated by two immiscible Newtonian fluids. In addition, Luo and Zeng (2011) constructed a coupled three-dimensional model of consolidation and groundwater extraction based on the viscoelasticplastic constitutive relation and rheological theory of Biot's poroelasticity, and used finite element method to simulate and compare groundwater level changes and soil compression.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%