1994
DOI: 10.1179/009346994791547661
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consolidation of Archaeological Bone: A Conservation Perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the particular case of historical bones, up to now, different methods of application of consolidates have been used for the restoration, brushing, immersion in solutions, or impregnation with consolidating agents, for instance [23,[25][26][27]. However, historical bones might present low mechanical consistency and it would be recommended to use less aggressive consolidation treatment methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the particular case of historical bones, up to now, different methods of application of consolidates have been used for the restoration, brushing, immersion in solutions, or impregnation with consolidating agents, for instance [23,[25][26][27]. However, historical bones might present low mechanical consistency and it would be recommended to use less aggressive consolidation treatment methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the bones were intensely affected by the exposure to physical agents (soil acidity), they called for a consolidation procedure. A construction product based on PVA (polyvinyl acetate) was used in the primary approach in an attempt to preserve and consolidate the frail elements and to connect the extremities of the long bone fragments [ 16 , 17 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first interventions carried out on fossils were performed with triterpenoid resins such as dammar, and other natural products: shellac, waxes and organic glues of animal origin [2][3][4]. These substances cause chromatic changes on the surface and yellowing, and they have shown a low compatibility with the fossil substrate in the long term, mainly because of their lack of plasticity [5]. These problems have led to their replacement by synthetic adhesives such as epoxy resins, cyanoacrylates, polyurethanes, fluorinated resins, and especially acrylic and vinyl polymers [6][7][8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%