1996
DOI: 10.1038/382252a0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consolidation in human motor memory

Abstract: Learning a motor skill sets in motion neural processes that continue to evolve after practice has ended, a phenomenon known as consolidation. Here we present psychophysical evidence for this, and show that consolidation of a motor skill was disrupted when a second motor task was learned immediately after the first. There was no disruption if four hours elapsed between learning the two motor skills, with consolidation occurring gradually over this period. Previous studies in humans and other primates have found… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

39
696
12
2

Year Published

1998
1998
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 886 publications
(769 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
39
696
12
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, we observed a very fast familiarization of the different techniques: the improvement of the performance between the first and second trial was very strong (by 50% and 30% with the robotic system in 2D and 3D, respectively), confirming the existence of a period of rapid initial learning as shown in other studies in surgery and cognitive psychology [2,5,7,9,14,21]. However, although all the learning curves reached a plateau at the end of the 10 trials, they followed a different pattern for each technique: as in the Prasad et al study [21], our results demonstrated an early phase of greater learning with the robotic system (in 2D and 3D), while the learning curve was extremely reduced, nearly nonexistent, in classical laparoscopy, in contrast to other studies that showed strong learning curves in classical laparoscopy [13].…”
Section: Familiarisation Phasesupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, we observed a very fast familiarization of the different techniques: the improvement of the performance between the first and second trial was very strong (by 50% and 30% with the robotic system in 2D and 3D, respectively), confirming the existence of a period of rapid initial learning as shown in other studies in surgery and cognitive psychology [2,5,7,9,14,21]. However, although all the learning curves reached a plateau at the end of the 10 trials, they followed a different pattern for each technique: as in the Prasad et al study [21], our results demonstrated an early phase of greater learning with the robotic system (in 2D and 3D), while the learning curve was extremely reduced, nearly nonexistent, in classical laparoscopy, in contrast to other studies that showed strong learning curves in classical laparoscopy [13].…”
Section: Familiarisation Phasesupporting
confidence: 84%
“…First phase: familiarisation Previous studies have shown a strong learning effect after the first use of laparoscopic techniques and in skill learning in general [2,7,9,14,21]. To decrease the learning effect in the subsequent motor tasks and to obtain homogenous groups concerning technical mastery [26], we organised a familiarisation phase.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have shown that similar improvements develop provided sleep occurs within a critical time after initial practice (Fischer et al 2002;Walker et al 2003). Some procedural memories also remain susceptible to interference for a critical time following acquisition (Brashers-Krug et al 1996;Muellbacher et al 2002;Walker et al 2003). Thus, a critical time window may be a general feature of offline processing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Internal models are neural mechanisms that mimic the inputoutput properties of controlled objects (Wolpert et al 1995;Brashers-Krug et al 1996;Kawato 1999;Imamizu et al 2000). Empirically, two types of information are crucial for the switching of internal models: contextual information such as color or shape of the objects that can be perceived before movement execution, and information about the difference between actual and predicted sensorimotor Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00221-007-0940-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%