2020
DOI: 10.3150/19-bej1153
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consistent structure estimation of exponential-family random graph models with block structure

Abstract: We consider the challenging problem of statistical inference for exponential-family random graph models based on a single observation of a random graph with complex dependence. To facilitate statistical inference, we consider random graphs with additional structure in the form of block structure. We have shown elsewhere that when the block structure is known, it facilitates consistency results for M -estimators of canonical and curved exponential-family random graph models with complex dependence, such as tran… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
(199 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In terms of computational complexity, a crucial avenue would involve determining the theoretical distribution for dissimilarity, ultimately contributing to significant reductions in computational overhead. Furthermore, the proposed framework can be extended to incorporate more sophisticated block models, such as exponential [44], multilevel [45], and dynamic [46] models, offering additional benefits and insights.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of computational complexity, a crucial avenue would involve determining the theoretical distribution for dissimilarity, ultimately contributing to significant reductions in computational overhead. Furthermore, the proposed framework can be extended to incorporate more sophisticated block models, such as exponential [44], multilevel [45], and dynamic [46] models, offering additional benefits and insights.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Box-Steffensmeier et al (2018) discuss how unmeasured nodal covariates can contribute to omitted variable bias and model degeneracy. Schweinberger and colleagues (Schweinberger 2020;Schweinberger and Handcock 2015;Stewart et al 2019) develop a similar argument for the broader case of nesting structure, where accounting for nesting structure improves estimation of decay parameters and out-of-sample statistics for triad and degree distributions in curved ERGMs (see Stewart et al 2019). Kim et al (2016) document that measurement error during network data collection can generate inaccurate sufficient statistics that bias ERGM coefficients.…”
Section: Sources Of Scalingmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…While recent studies have sought to address several sources of residual variation, including unobserved heterogeneity (unmeasured nodal covariates; Box-Steffensmeier, Christenson, and Morgan 2018; Thiemichen et al 2016; van Duijn, Snijders, and Zijlstra 2004), nesting structure (Schweinberger 2020; Schweinberger and Handcock 2015; Stewart et al 2019), and measurement error (Kim, Leonardo, and Kirkland 2016), the consequences of scaling for statistical inference using ERGM have been largely overlooked. In addition to these sources, we show that scaling can affect ERGM results even when omitted variables are uncorrelated with other predictors .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 2013 ; Gross et al. 2021 ; Schweinberger 2020 ; Schweinberger and Handcock 2015 ; Schweinberger and Luna 2018 ; Wang et al. 2019 ), samples from larger networks (An 2016 ; Handcock and Gile 2010 ; Pattison et al.…”
Section: Exponential Random Graph Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%