2020
DOI: 10.1111/ele.13507
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consistent sociality but flexible social associations across temporal and spatial foraging contexts in a colonial breeder

Abstract: When the consequences of sociality differ depending on the state of individual animals and the experienced environment, individuals may benefit from altering their social behaviours in a context‐dependent manner. Thus, to fully address the hypotheses about the role of social associations it is imperative to consider the multidimensional nature of sociality by explicitly examining social associations across multiple scales and contexts. We simultaneously recorded > 8000 associations from 85% of breeding individ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Competition will counteract the advantages of larger group sizes, although this effect may be reduced if patch quality is highly variable and if travel times to patches are short (Sernland andOlsson 2003, Smolla et al 2015). Empirical support for these predictions can be found in bats and seabirds where social foraging is generally only seen in species or individuals foraging on ephemeral prey (Egert-Berg et al 2018, Jones et al 2020.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Competition will counteract the advantages of larger group sizes, although this effect may be reduced if patch quality is highly variable and if travel times to patches are short (Sernland andOlsson 2003, Smolla et al 2015). Empirical support for these predictions can be found in bats and seabirds where social foraging is generally only seen in species or individuals foraging on ephemeral prey (Egert-Berg et al 2018, Jones et al 2020.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Fission-fusion dynamics can contribute to or smaller groups (e.g. Wakefield et al 2013, Hooker et al 2015, Jones et al 2020. In most cases, the central place is the location of a nest, shelter, or haul-out site which explains loyalty and fidelity to the central place.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since unit effect of direct and indirect benefits are not equivalent, an individual’s decision to cooperate is based on the cost-benefit trade-offs that originate from such discrepancies over the long-term 2 , 3 . These trade-offs are primarily resource and socially mediated, and consequently such decisions are context driven and often exhibit plasticity across temporal and spatial scales 4 , 5 , resulting in diverse instances and pathways of cooperation. For example, in common vampire bats Desmodus rotundus food-sharing is better explained by previous mutualistic encounters than relatedness between the donors and recipients 6 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fisher, Rodríguez‐Muñoz, & Tregenza, 2016; Shizuka et al., 2014), as well as ones with extensive rewiring in interactions of the same individuals over time (e.g. Jones et al., 2020). These studies suggest that the relative contribution of β OS and β ST on overall network dissimilarity ( β WN ) is likely to range across almost the entire {0,1} interval, but we are aware of no previous studies of social networks that employed this breakdown, so cannot compare our own results to other relevant estimates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, observations of other dynamic social networks have shown situations with relatively stable individual interactions but high turnover (e.g Fisher, Rodríguez-Muñoz, & Tregenza, 2016;Shizuka et al, 2014),. as well as ones with extensive rewiring in interactions of the same individuals over time (e.g Jones et al, 2020)…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%