2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-10605-2_22
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consistent Re-identification in a Camera Network

Abstract: Most existing person re-identification methods focus on finding similarities between persons between pairs of cameras (camera pairwise re-identification) without explicitly maintaining consistency of the results across the network. This may lead to infeasible associations when results from different camera pairs are combined. In this paper, we propose a network consistent re-identification (NCR) framework, which is formulated as an optimization problem that not only maintains consistency in re-identification r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
119
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 149 publications
(119 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
119
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We show results in terms of recognition rate as cumulative matching characteristic (CMC) curves and normalized area-under-curve (nAUC) values, as is common practice in ReID literature [46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53]. The CMC curve is a plot of recognition performance versus re-identification ranking score, and represents the expectation of finding a correct match in the top k matches.…”
Section: Datasets and Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We show results in terms of recognition rate as cumulative matching characteristic (CMC) curves and normalized area-under-curve (nAUC) values, as is common practice in ReID literature [46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53]. The CMC curve is a plot of recognition performance versus re-identification ranking score, and represents the expectation of finding a correct match in the top k matches.…”
Section: Datasets and Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We further quantified ReID performance using the graphs with P vs. nAUC. Following the literature [4,24,47,53], in all our experiments the gallery and the validation set are kept disjointed and we repeated each task 10 times by randomly picking the identities in validation and gallery. For each camera pair, we fixed the number of identities in the gallery to G = 50 for PRID 2011 and SAIVT-SoftBio, G = 25 for CAVIAR4REID and G = 316 for VIPeR.…”
Section: Datasets and Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast we compute similarities between entities and do not need to impose positive semidefinite conditions during training. Our method is also related to [43] where an integer optimization method was proposed to enforce network consistency in re-id during testing, i.e. maintaining consistency in re-id results across the network.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Figueira et al [12] proposed a semi-supervised learning method to fuse multi-view features for Re-ID so that the features agree on the classification results. Das et al [5] considered the group membership prediction in Re-ID by maximizing the summation of pairwise similarity scores using binary integer programming during testing. Unlike [5], we formulate the group membership problem as a learning problem, rather than a post-processing step to improve the matching rate.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Das et al [5] considered the group membership prediction in Re-ID by maximizing the summation of pairwise similarity scores using binary integer programming during testing. Unlike [5], we formulate the group membership problem as a learning problem, rather than a post-processing step to improve the matching rate.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%