2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0304-4076(00)00077-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consistent model and moment selection procedures for GMM estimation with application to dynamic panel data models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
453
0
9

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 708 publications
(469 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
7
453
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…As Caner (2009) noticed, models do not need to be nested, but one can rather construct a single large parametric model merging two orthogonal models and let the selection method choose one of the two models. A typical application is structural change models as explained in Andrews and Lu (2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Caner (2009) noticed, models do not need to be nested, but one can rather construct a single large parametric model merging two orthogonal models and let the selection method choose one of the two models. A typical application is structural change models as explained in Andrews and Lu (2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior to the estimation, we have to determine the optimal lag order of the independent variables in the system of equations. We employ the moment selection criteria and downward testing procedures developed by Andrews and Lu (2001). Based on the Hansen test statistics, the optimal lag is found to be one year.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, to choose the optimal lag order in both panel VARX specification and moment condition, we use moment and model selection criteria (MMSC) for GMM models based on Hansen [18])'s J-statistic of over-identifying restrictions [3]. Applying MMSC to the GMM estimator, the criteria for selecting lag order is minimizing M-BIC (Bayesian Information Criterion), M-AIC (Akaike's Information Criterion), and M-QIC (Hannan and Quinn Information Criterion).…”
Section: Table2 Unit Root Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%