1992
DOI: 10.1103/revmodphys.64.339
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consistent interpretations of quantum mechanics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

6
354
0
1

Year Published

1994
1994
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 585 publications
(361 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
6
354
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Because the probabilities can be measured experimentally, they should be unambiguously predicted -at least to within experimental precision. [16,[19][20][21][22][23][24], and Gell-Mann and Hartle [3,18,25] make the same point.…”
Section: Approximate Consistencymentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Because the probabilities can be measured experimentally, they should be unambiguously predicted -at least to within experimental precision. [16,[19][20][21][22][23][24], and Gell-Mann and Hartle [3,18,25] make the same point.…”
Section: Approximate Consistencymentioning
confidence: 67%
“…As well known, Everett assumed that every quantum possibility is actualized in some branch of a multi-valued universe [11]. An opposite viewpoint stressed that every theory -even a classical one-can only deal with potentialities and never with actuality, so that the problem of reduction might well be outside the reach of theoretical physics [12]. Many people nevertheless consider that the problem of reduction belongs properly to physics and should even be considered among the most significant ones in understanding the foundations of science.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The projection operators P j and the densities are time-dependent (think for instance of a moving part of an apparatus). Very often, they are microlocal (semi-classical) projection operators, whose definition has been given elsewhere [12,25,26]. The quantity T r(P j ρ S P j ) is a constant, equal to the standard probability p j for observing at any time t after decoherence the property j with projection operator P j (t).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Griffiths and Omnes [2][3][4][5][6] have proposed an interpretive scheme for traditional quantum mechanics in which the Hilbert space based mathematical formalism is retained, the reduction postulate is discarded and Eq. (2) is interpreted as the probability for the history (1) for a closed system S (no external observers).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%