2021
DOI: 10.1186/s40623-021-01474-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consistent estimation of strain-rate fields from GNSS velocity data using basis function expansion with ABIC

Abstract: Present day crustal displacement rates can be accurately observed at stations of global navigation satellite system (GNSS), and crustal deformation has been investigated by estimating strain-rate fields from discrete GNSS data. For this purpose, a modified least-square inversion method was proposed by Shen et al. (J Geophys Res 101:27957–27980, 1996). This method offers a simple formulation for simultaneously estimating smooth velocity and strain-rate fields from GNSS data, and it has contributed to clarify cr… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These requirements must be balanced with an increasing computational cost. In addition, some problems require careful treatment of basis functions at model boundaries (Fukahata & Wright, 2008;Okazaki et al, 2021). When continental-scale data are analyzed, basis functions must be set to conform to a spherical Earth (Tape et al, 2009).…”
Section: Model Regionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These requirements must be balanced with an increasing computational cost. In addition, some problems require careful treatment of basis functions at model boundaries (Fukahata & Wright, 2008;Okazaki et al, 2021). When continental-scale data are analyzed, basis functions must be set to conform to a spherical Earth (Tape et al, 2009).…”
Section: Model Regionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, elastic deformation attributed to interplate coupling is fully released by interplate megathrust earthquakes; therefore, it can modulate the timing of crustal earthquakes but does not permanently load crustal faults (e.g., Hori and Oike, 1999;Mitogawa and Nishimura, 2020). Therefore, we used the corrected velocity after the removal of elastic deformation and estimated the strain rate distribution using the method proposed by Okazaki et al (2021), in which the velocity field is subjectively optimized by the expansion of the bicubic B-spline basis function.…”
Section: Gnss Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These contrasting findings can be attributed to notable differences between the data analysis procedures. That is, we used a high-resolution distribution of the GNSS strain rate derived from a larger number of GNSS stations, optimal smoothing of the strain rate distribution (Okazaki et al, 2021), and a finer coupling model on the subducting plate interface (Nishimura et al, 2018). Moreover, the analyzed region was limited to southwest Japan in this study, but covers most of Japan in the work of Triyoso and Shimazaki (2012).…”
Section: Retrospective Testing Of the Forecast Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To estimate the strain-rate eld, we use the surface displacement data of GEONET, a GNSS array by the Geospatial Information Authority of Japan (GSI), as in many previous studies (e.g., Sagiya et al 2000;Nishimura et al 2018;Fukahata et al 2020). In recent years, several methods have been developed for calculating strain rates from surface displacement data that can take into account the spatial heterogeneity of station spacing (Shen et al 2015;Sandwell and Wessel 2016;Okazaki et al 2021). With the development of automatic polarity picking based on machine learning, focal mechanisms of smaller earthquakes can be estimated more accurately than before (Uchide 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%