2018
DOI: 10.1007/jhep07(2018)021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consistent deformations of free massive field theories in the Stueckelberg formulation

Abstract: Cohomological techniques within the Batalin-Vilkovisky (BV) extension of the Becchi-Rouet-Stora-Tyutin (BRST) formalism have proved invaluable for classifying consistent deformations of gauge theories. In this work we investigate the application of this idea to massive field theories in the Stueckelberg formulation. Starting with a collection of free massive vectors, we show that the cohomological method reproduces the cubic and quartic vertices of massive Yang-Mills theory. In the same way, taking a Fierz-Pau… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
27
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
2
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the motivations for introducing the Stueckelberg fields is the idea to provide consistent inclusion of interactions by controlling compatibility of Stueckelberg gauge symmetry when the free theory is deformed. This idea works well in various examples, see [3] and references therein. However, it does not seem a consistent general scheme, as it controls just algebraic consistency of the Stueckelberg symmetry, not the number of propagating DoF's, while the artificial symmetry is not necessarily reasonably related to the structure of the dynamics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…One of the motivations for introducing the Stueckelberg fields is the idea to provide consistent inclusion of interactions by controlling compatibility of Stueckelberg gauge symmetry when the free theory is deformed. This idea works well in various examples, see [3] and references therein. However, it does not seem a consistent general scheme, as it controls just algebraic consistency of the Stueckelberg symmetry, not the number of propagating DoF's, while the artificial symmetry is not necessarily reasonably related to the structure of the dynamics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…In this article, the class of field theories is considered such that the action does not admit gauge symmetry 3 , while the Lagrangian equations are not involutive. The involutive closure ( 3) is non-Lagrangian as such, though it is equivalent to the original Lagrangian system (1).…”
Section: Gauge Algebra Of the Involutive Closure Of Lagrangian Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We refer the reader to the Section 2 of [27] and to [28] for pedagogical introductions. The case of deformations of massive theories was analyzed in the same framework in [29].…”
Section: Deformation Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is completely analogous to the treatment of massive field theories in the Stückelberg formulation, see e.g [48,49]…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%