DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-75410-7_17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consistent Data Integration in P2P Deductive Databases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These approaches assume that for each peer it is preferable to import as much knowledge as possible. Our previous works in [9,13,14,16,17] follow this same direction. The interaction among deductive databases in a P2P system has been modeled by importing, by means of mapping rules, maximal sets of atoms not violating integrity constraints, that is maximal sets of atoms that allow the peer to enrich its knowledge while preventing inconsistency anomalies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…These approaches assume that for each peer it is preferable to import as much knowledge as possible. Our previous works in [9,13,14,16,17] follow this same direction. The interaction among deductive databases in a P2P system has been modeled by importing, by means of mapping rules, maximal sets of atoms not violating integrity constraints, that is maximal sets of atoms that allow the peer to enrich its knowledge while preventing inconsistency anomalies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…In previous works [9,13,14,16,17] and in [15] of the same authors two alternative mechanism for importing knowledge from other peers, have been proposed. This let to the proposal of two alternative semantics.…”
Section: P2p Systems: Syntax and Seman-ticsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In [9,12,13,14,15] the interaction among deductive databases in a P2P system has been modeled by importing, by means of mapping rules, maximal sets of atoms not violating integrity constraints, that is maximal sets of atoms that allow the peer to enrich its knowledge while preventing inconsistency anomalies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%