2021
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261581
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consistent condom utilization and associated factors among HIV positive clients attending ART clinic at Pawi general hospital, North West Ethiopia

Abstract: Background Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) affects a highly significant number of people and is responsible for the deaths of many people in sub-Saharan African countries alone. The best prevention method for this virus is through consistent condom utilization which can help to prevent drug-resistant HIV infection and acquisition of new infection. Therefore, this study aimed to assess consistent condom utilization and associated factors among HIV-positive individuals attending an antiretroviral therapy clin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Subsequently, 55 full-text articles were thoroughly assessed based on the inclusion criteria 10 , 11 , 20 – 72 . Finally, a total of 33 studies 10 , 11 , 20 – 22 , 24 27 , 29 , 32 , 34 , 36 , 38 , 45 55 , 65 – 72 meeting the inclusion criteria were included in the meta-analysis (Fig. 1 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Subsequently, 55 full-text articles were thoroughly assessed based on the inclusion criteria 10 , 11 , 20 – 72 . Finally, a total of 33 studies 10 , 11 , 20 – 22 , 24 27 , 29 , 32 , 34 , 36 , 38 , 45 55 , 65 – 72 meeting the inclusion criteria were included in the meta-analysis (Fig. 1 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The studies included in this systematic review and meta-analysis had no considerable risk based on the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale quality appraisal criteria. Therefore, all the studies were considered in this review 10 , 11 , 20 – 22 , 24 27 , 29 , 32 , 34 , 36 , 38 , 45 55 , 65 – 72 (Table 1 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%