The purpose of Dr Frevert's article was to compare the neurotoxin content of each of the BoNT-A products in the vial. [1] A new figure has now appeared for Xeomin Ò , 0.44 ng per vial, as compared to the 0.6 ng previously published. [16] This finding is somewhat dismissed as a technical issue but, in reality, represents a 27% reduction. Could this be due to changes in the product since the data were first reported or the product first used (perhaps changes in batches of active component, for example, see Quarta [17] or other issues)? Whatever the cause, this significant difference is a product inconsistency that warranted further comment, representing an important aspect of the work to the cliniciansconsistent product gives consistent clinical results. Data comparing the characteristics of the various BoNT-A products and misleadingly comparing these to labeled units are not helping clinicians select products for use. Instead, detailed overall data, notably on history of product consistency, such as those previously published for Dysport Ò , [10] are important for clinicians and these are still awaited for the other BoNT-A products. Perhaps the time has also come to stop discussing BoNT-A complex 'sizes' in a clinical context unless and until data are produced that clearly demonstrate any relevance to clinical use? None now seem likely.