2011
DOI: 10.5950/0738-1360-26.4.267
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consistent Aggregation in Fish Demand: A Study of French Salmon Demand

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies using datasets from the 1990s and earlier have typically found that the demand for salmon is elastic (Asche, Bjørndal, and Salvanes 1998;Asche, Bremnes, and Wessells 1999;Asche, Salvanes, and Steen 1997;DeVoretz and Salvanes 1993), whereas a review of the recent literature, using data from the late 1990s to 2010, has reported elasticity values both in the elastic and inelastic ranges; between −0.2 and −1.7 ( For markets in which previous studies have reported elasticities of demand for salmon, we set the elasticity parameter to the mean of the reported values. This process yields the following elasticity values: for the United States, −0.7 (Jones, Wozniak, and Walters 2013;Davis, Lin, and Yen 2007); for the EU mainland, −1.1 (Xie and Myrland 2011); and for Japan, -1.5 (Sakai et al 2009). Markets such as Brazil, Russia, and the ROW have a lower average income than the European Union and Japan, for instance, and it might be expected that the income difference would be reflected in more elastic salmon demand.…”
Section: Data and Elasticity Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies using datasets from the 1990s and earlier have typically found that the demand for salmon is elastic (Asche, Bjørndal, and Salvanes 1998;Asche, Bremnes, and Wessells 1999;Asche, Salvanes, and Steen 1997;DeVoretz and Salvanes 1993), whereas a review of the recent literature, using data from the late 1990s to 2010, has reported elasticity values both in the elastic and inelastic ranges; between −0.2 and −1.7 ( For markets in which previous studies have reported elasticities of demand for salmon, we set the elasticity parameter to the mean of the reported values. This process yields the following elasticity values: for the United States, −0.7 (Jones, Wozniak, and Walters 2013;Davis, Lin, and Yen 2007); for the EU mainland, −1.1 (Xie and Myrland 2011); and for Japan, -1.5 (Sakai et al 2009). Markets such as Brazil, Russia, and the ROW have a lower average income than the European Union and Japan, for instance, and it might be expected that the income difference would be reflected in more elastic salmon demand.…”
Section: Data and Elasticity Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early studies focused on the different salmon species and aggregate product forms and were conducted mostly at the trade level (Herrmann et al, 1993;Wessells & Wilen, 1994;Asche, 1996). In recent years, the focus has narrowed to farmed salmon (Xie et al, 2009;Xie & Myrland, 2011) as well as models (Kinnucan & Myrland, 2002, 2007. This also tends to be the case for market integration studies, although Asche and Guttormsen (2001) have also examined different fish sizes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kinnucan et al, 1997). This approach is commonly applied in empirical work on salmon demand (Bjørndal et al 1992;Asche 1996;Xie et al 2009;Xie and Myrland 2011). In this article, I adopt a parsimonious approach to measuring demand shifts; yearly changes in price and quantities are decomposed between regional supply and demand shifts, and the relative impact from each supply and demand shift on price is determined.…”
Section: Fig 1 Fao Food Price Indices 1990-2013mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Demand elasticities vary between -0.2 and -1.7, with mean and median around -0.75 (Fousekis and Revell 2004;Davis et al 2007;Hong and Duc 2009;Sakai et al 2009;Xie et al 2009;Tiffin and Arnoult 2010;Asheim et al 2011;Muhammad and Jones 2011;Xie and Myrland 2011;Chidmi et al 2012;Singh et al 2012;Jones et al 2013). The values vary by product form, period length, income level and market location.…”
Section: Price Impactsmentioning
confidence: 99%