2019
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201834412
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consistent accretion-induced heating of the neutron-star crust in MXB 1659−29 during two different outbursts

Abstract: Monitoring the cooling of neutron-star crusts heated during accretion outbursts allows us to infer the physics of the dense matter present in the crust. We examine the crust cooling evolution of the low-mass X-ray binary MXB 1659−29 up to ∼505 days after the end of its 2015 outburst (hereafter outburst II) and compare it with what we observed after its previous 1999 outburst (hereafter outburst I) using data obtained from the Swift, XMM-Newton, and Chandra observatories. The observed effective surface temperat… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

6
52
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
6
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An asterisk is used whenever the error range hit the hard boundary of that fit parameter in the model. In the standard fit for the 2016 data, the core temperature in the neutron star frame was fixed to the value obtained by Ootes et al (2018), T 0 = 8.9 × 10 7 K. In the alternative fit we allowed the core temperature to be lower, which yielded T 0 = 2.9 +1.0 −0.6 × 10 7 K. Degenaar et al 2014Degenaar et al , 2015Parikh et al 2017bParikh et al , 2019Ootes et al 2016Ootes et al , 2018. If crust cooling can be studied in Aql X-1, its frequent outbursts provide the opportunity to study the properties of this shallow heating after several different outbursts, thereby allowing to break degeneracies with neutron star specific parameters that may be involved in shallow heating and do not change between different outbursts (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…An asterisk is used whenever the error range hit the hard boundary of that fit parameter in the model. In the standard fit for the 2016 data, the core temperature in the neutron star frame was fixed to the value obtained by Ootes et al (2018), T 0 = 8.9 × 10 7 K. In the alternative fit we allowed the core temperature to be lower, which yielded T 0 = 2.9 +1.0 −0.6 × 10 7 K. Degenaar et al 2014Degenaar et al , 2015Parikh et al 2017bParikh et al , 2019Ootes et al 2016Ootes et al , 2018. If crust cooling can be studied in Aql X-1, its frequent outbursts provide the opportunity to study the properties of this shallow heating after several different outbursts, thereby allowing to break degeneracies with neutron star specific parameters that may be involved in shallow heating and do not change between different outbursts (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are two other neutron stars for which crust cooling has been studied after different outbursts; MAXI J0556-332 (Homan et al 2014;Parikh et al 2017a) and MXB 1659-298 (e.g. Wijnands et al 2004;Cackett et al 2013b;Parikh et al 2019). For MAXI J0556-332, which exhibited 3 outbursts of different duration and peak intensity, there is clear evidence that the depth and magnitude of shallow heating varies between the different outbursts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As a final remark, let us point that construction of diffusion equilibrium crust, in principle, can be important for the shallow heating problem -the phenomenological powerful heating source of unknown nature, which is introduced to the models of crustal cooling to explain observational data (Meisel et al 2018;Degenaar et al 2019;Parikh et al 2019). This source is typically assumed to be localized in outer crust, thus it is rather unlikely that neutron diffusion provides a direct mechanism to explain this source.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%