2018
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1037/2/022024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consistent 3D CFD and BEM simulations of a research turbine considering rotational augmentation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Schneider et al [25] documented that the polar data extracted from the 3D CFD simulation of a 7.5 MW wind turbine enhanced the BEM prediction significantly. A similar conclusion was obtained very recently by Guma et al [26] for a 750 kW research turbine. They observed that the origin of the polars is a crucial input that can make strong difference in the results.…”
Section: Motivation and State Of The Artsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Schneider et al [25] documented that the polar data extracted from the 3D CFD simulation of a 7.5 MW wind turbine enhanced the BEM prediction significantly. A similar conclusion was obtained very recently by Guma et al [26] for a 750 kW research turbine. They observed that the origin of the polars is a crucial input that can make strong difference in the results.…”
Section: Motivation and State Of The Artsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In this case, the blade needs to be modeled aerodynamically with as many nodes as structurally, i.e., 21 for each blade. Polars have been extracted from 3D CFD calculations in order to avoid the use of any tip or hub correction model and ensure as much consistency as possible to the CFD calculations, as it was already shown in Guma et al (2018). The 3D polars have been provided in a range of angles of attack (AOAs) of between around −30 and +30 • and have been extracted from the CFD solution using the RAV method (Rahimi et al, 2018) and then extrapolated up to −180 to +180 • using the Viterna method.…”
Section: Bem Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These are not considered in a two-dimensional (2D) presentation of the blade, see Hansen et al (2006) and Syed Ahmed Kabir and Ng (2017) for more details. It is possible to obtain the 3D airfoil data by CFD approaches for use by the BEM, see, for instance, Du and Selig (1998), Du and Selig (2000), and Guma et al (2018). Another limitation of BEM method is that the effect of the adjacent elements is neglected.…”
Section: Low-fidelity Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%