Consistency of Reported Outcomes After Arthroscopic Management of Femoroacetabular Impingement

Hetaimish, Bandar M; Khan, Moin; Crouch, Sarah; Simunovic, Nicole; Bedi, Asheesh; Mohtadi, Nicholas G.; Bhandari, Mohit; Ayeni, Olufemi R.

doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2012.11.011

Cited by 54 publications

(34 citation statements)

References 49 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The studies were inconsistent regarding imaging modalities used and patient-reported outcomes. Hetaimish et al 49 have previously highlighted inconsistency of reported outcomes after FAI surgery and a need for consistency in reporting outcomes to compare studies. Most of the data findings in this review are therefore associative, not causative.…”

Section: Revision Hip Arthroscopymentioning

confidence: 98%

Revision Hip Arthroscopy Indications and Outcomes: A Systematic Review

Sardana

Philippon

et al. 2015

Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery

Self Cite

156

101

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Revision Hip Arthroscopymentioning

confidence: 98%

Revision Hip Arthroscopy Indications and Outcomes: A Systematic Review

Sardana

Philippon

et al. 2015

Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery

Self Cite

156

101

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Reported postsurgical complication rates are quite variable 16 84. They range from the development of adhesions to deep venous thrombosis and chronic regional pain syndrome 85.…”

Section: Treatment Of Fai—more Questions Than Answersmentioning

confidence: 99%

Femoroacetabular impingement surgery: are we moving too fast and too far beyond the evidence?

Reiman

Thorborg

2015

Br J Sports Med

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Femoroacetabuler impingement (FAI) is becoming increasingly recognised as a potential pathological entity for individuals with hip pain. Surgery described to correct FAI has risen exponentially in the past 10 years with the use of hip arthroscopy. Unfortunately, the strength of evidence supporting both the examination and treatment of FAI does not appear to accommodate this exponential growth. In fact, the direction currently taken for FAI is similar to previously described paths of other orthopaedic and sports medicine pathologies (eg, shoulder impingement, knee meniscus tear) for which we have learned valuable lessons. The time has come for improved terminology, study design, and focus on delineation of successful treatment variables in the interest of those individuals with clinical indications of FAI so that we can appropriately address their needs.

show abstract

“…With adequate training, arthroscopic osseous correction [ 3,6,16 ] as well as treatment of labral and chondral damages [ 34,37 ] in standard FAI affecting the anterior aspect of the joint can now be performed comparably to open surgery [ 27 ]. Most reports on clinical or radiographic results after arthroscopic treatment of FAI are however limited by short-term followup [ 12,25 ] and thus the success or failure of these procedures over time is not known.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%