2013
DOI: 10.1186/1297-9686-45-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consistency of linkage disequilibrium between Chinese and Nordic Holsteins and genomic prediction for Chinese Holsteins using a joint reference population

Abstract: BackgroundIn China, the reference population of genotyped Holstein cattle is relatively small with to date, 80 bulls and 2091 cows genotyped with the Illumina 54 K chip. Including genotyped Holstein cattle from other countries in the reference population could improve the accuracy of genomic prediction of the Chinese Holstein population. This study investigated the consistency of linkage disequilibrium between adjacent markers between the Chinese and Nordic Holstein populations, and compared the reliability of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

9
46
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
9
46
1
Order By: Relevance
“…So far, studies of the extent of LD have been reported mostly for dairy and beef cattle breeds under selection, but there is little information about the degree of genome-wide LD in local cattle breeds and populations. Considering the LD levels between adjacent markers, the average r 2 in the MOD breed was comparable to those reported for] indigenous Swiss Eringer (r 2 = 0.24; Flury et al, 2010), Blonde d'Aquitaine (r 2 = 0.20; Beghain et al, 2013), and Chinese and Nordic Holsteins (r 2 = 0.20 and 0.21, respectively; Zhou et al, 2013), whereas the CIN breed had lower values. The results may be explained by considering the influence of selection on LD; in fact, the CIN breed is not subject to breeding programs, whereas the MOD breed is characterized by low selection pressure.…”
Section: Linkage Disequilibriumsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…So far, studies of the extent of LD have been reported mostly for dairy and beef cattle breeds under selection, but there is little information about the degree of genome-wide LD in local cattle breeds and populations. Considering the LD levels between adjacent markers, the average r 2 in the MOD breed was comparable to those reported for] indigenous Swiss Eringer (r 2 = 0.24; Flury et al, 2010), Blonde d'Aquitaine (r 2 = 0.20; Beghain et al, 2013), and Chinese and Nordic Holsteins (r 2 = 0.20 and 0.21, respectively; Zhou et al, 2013), whereas the CIN breed had lower values. The results may be explained by considering the influence of selection on LD; in fact, the CIN breed is not subject to breeding programs, whereas the MOD breed is characterized by low selection pressure.…”
Section: Linkage Disequilibriumsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…When combining Holstein Friesian (HF) populations large improvements were realized in North American studies (Schenkel et al, 2009;Vanraden et al, 2012) and in the EuroGenomics collaboration . As an example of a small HF population, genomic predictions for Chinese HF using a joint reference with Nordic HF increases accuracies substantially (Zhou et al, 2013). This could be regarded as more surprising since environmental and management factors are very different between Chinese and Nordic Holstein populations.…”
Section: Reliability Of Gebvs In Relation To Genomic Relationshipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of genomic prediction accuracy, the results of these studies vary widely. The reported increase in accuracy has reached up to 32% (Zhou et al, 2013), but also losses in reliability have been observed when using joint reference populations (e.g. Erbe et al, 2012).…”
Section: Combining Populations From Different Countries or Different mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sharing genotypes has been shown to be especially profitable if one population has a very small size. Zhou et al (2013) increased nearly four times the Chinese Holstein Friesian reference population by adding Nordic reference animals. They gained an increase in reliability between 25% and 32% for milk performance traits.…”
Section: Combining Populations From Different Countries or Different mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation