2007
DOI: 10.3758/bf03193280
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consistency effects between objects in scenes

Abstract: How does context influence the perception of objects in scenes? Objects appear in a given setting with surrounding objects. Do objects in scenes exert contextual influences on each other? Do these influences interact with background consistency? In three experiments, we investigated the role of object-to-object context on object and scene perception. Objects (Experiments 1 and 3) and backgrounds (Experiment 2) were reported more accurately when the objects and their settings were consistent than when they were… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

14
122
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 142 publications
(139 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
14
122
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We hypothesize that just as scene categories can constrain identification of canonical and noncanonical objects (cf. Davenport, 2007;Davenport & Potter, 2004), global scene-identity information can limit the access of local contingency information in memory. In the context of the present study, when global scene identity did not give rise to reasonable expectations concerning a pillow's presence or location, the localist "the target is on a pillow" rule was not invoked.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We hypothesize that just as scene categories can constrain identification of canonical and noncanonical objects (cf. Davenport, 2007;Davenport & Potter, 2004), global scene-identity information can limit the access of local contingency information in memory. In the context of the present study, when global scene identity did not give rise to reasonable expectations concerning a pillow's presence or location, the localist "the target is on a pillow" rule was not invoked.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using natural images, Davenport and Potter (2004) reported that semantic scene congruency had an effect on the processing of both the target object and its context. Davenport (2007) also found that objects were reported more accurately when the objects and their settings were consistent than when they were inconsistent, regardless of the number of foreground objects. These findings suggest that object categorization in natural scenes is promoted by the consistent background.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The lack of age-related change in natural scene perception may be attributed to the nature of scene perception itself. Recent studies have reported that object categorization benefits from the contextual information in scenes (Bar, 2004;Davenport, 2007;Davenport & Potter, 2004;Torralba, Oliva, Castelhano, & Henderson, 2006). Using natural images, Davenport and Potter (2004) reported that semantic scene congruency had an effect on the processing of both the target object and its context.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Disrupting the coherence of items in complex displays have been shown to have adverse effects on recognizing and manipulating objects (Mudrik, Lamy, & Deouell, 2010;Davenport & Potter, 2004;Ganis & Kutas, 2003;Bar & Ullman, 1996;Biederman, Glass, & Stacy, 1973;Biederman, 1972) on the recognition of scenes (Davenport, 2007;Joubert, Rousselet, Fize, & FabreThorpe, 2007) and can affect the interpretation of ambiguous objects (Palmer, 1975). The disruption of spatial coherency in the arrangement of objects in a display can also affect the measured hemodynamic response in context selective regions (Gronau, Neta, & Bar, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%