2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.physletb.2017.01.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consistency between SU(3) and SU(2) covariant baryon chiral perturbation theory for the nucleon mass

Abstract: Treating the strange quark mass as a heavy scale compared to the light quark mass, we perform a matching of the nucleon mass in the SU(3) sector to the two-flavor case in covariant baryon chiral perturbation theory. The validity of the 19 low-energy constants appearing in the octet baryon masses up to next-to-next-to-next-toleading order [1] is supported by comparing the effective parameters (the combinations of the 19 couplings) with the corresponding low-energy constants in the SU(2) sector [2]. In addition,… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is not surprising since as shown in Ref. [40] the SU(3) and SU(2) BChPT are consistent with each other within uncertainties, particularly for m π < 300 MeV. Second, one should note that our results are tied to the quality of the lattice QCD data that we fitted.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is not surprising since as shown in Ref. [40] the SU(3) and SU(2) BChPT are consistent with each other within uncertainties, particularly for m π < 300 MeV. Second, one should note that our results are tied to the quality of the lattice QCD data that we fitted.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Following Ref. [40], we take f π = 0.0871 GeV, g A = 1.267, and µ = 1.0 GeV in our numerical study, unless otherwise specified.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also shown for comparison in the figures are determinations from the FH method which utilize more than one lattice data set [454,455,949,[954][955][956][957][958][959][960] as well as results for σ π N obtained from recent analyses of π -N scattering [940][941][942]961]. There is some tension, at the level of three to four standard deviations, between the lattice average for N f = 2 + 1 and Hoferichter et al [942], who quote a precision similar to that of the average.…”
Section: Summary Of Results For G Uds Smentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Determinations via the direct approach are indicated by squares and the Feynman-Hellmann method by triangles. Results from calculations which analyse more than one lattice data set within the Feynman-Hellmann approach [454,455,949,[954][955][956][957][958][959][960] are shown for comparison (pentagons) along with those from recent analyses of π -N scattering [940][941][942]961] (circles) Fig. 45 Lattice results and FLAG averages for σ s for the N f = 2, 2 + 1, and 2 + 1 + 1 flavour calculations.…”
Section: S From Direct and Hybrid Calculations Of The Matrix Elementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, these properties can be generated as functions of pion masses in ChEFT. Therefore, there are many attempts to extrapolate the LQCD results of hadrons to physical pion mass with the help of ChEFT, such as baryon masses, axial coupling constants, magnetic moments [1][2][3][4], and so on. These works largely improved our understanding on the QCD theory for single hadrons at low energy region.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%