2018
DOI: 10.1108/el-10-2016-0230
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Considering social information in constructing research topic maps

Abstract: Purpose In academic work, it is important to identify a specific domain of research. Many researchers may look to conference issues to determine interesting or new topics. Furthermore, conference issues can help researchers identify current research trends in their field and learn about cutting-edge developments in their area of specialization. However, so much conference information is published online that it can be difficult to navigate and analyze in a meaningful or productive way. Hence, the use of knowle… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 30 publications
(45 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This paper analysed how topics evolved in the COVID-19 event on social media. In the method of text clustering, it is effective to interpret qualitatively how people expressed their thoughts and detect the topics the people were most discussing on social media (Wang et al , 2018; Xing et al , 2021a, 2021b). The results show that, in the initial stage, Twitter users mainly paid attention to the epidemic in Wuhan, China, which is considered the headstream.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper analysed how topics evolved in the COVID-19 event on social media. In the method of text clustering, it is effective to interpret qualitatively how people expressed their thoughts and detect the topics the people were most discussing on social media (Wang et al , 2018; Xing et al , 2021a, 2021b). The results show that, in the initial stage, Twitter users mainly paid attention to the epidemic in Wuhan, China, which is considered the headstream.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%