2008
DOI: 10.1086/523910
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Considering Popular Fiction and Library Practices of Recommendation: The Literary Status of “The Clique” and Its Historical Progenitors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Few information science researchers have explored fiction, but those who have include Ross (1999), Rothbauer (2004 and, Ross et al (2006), Agosto & Hughes-Hassell (2010 and Thelwall & Kousha (2017). Additional information science research exploring fiction include work about information behavior and affect (e.g., the chapters in Nahl & Bilal, 2007, especially McKechnie et al), so-called confessional methods in information behavior research (e.g., Davenport, 2010), materials challenged in libraries (e.g., Pattee, 2008), and "the pleasurable" and fiction (Kari & Hartel, 2007). There is also a literature on fiction as the particular object of search (e.g., Ooi & Liew, 2011;Anna & Pertti, 2017), on the difficulties of cataloging and intellectual control of more creative works especially novels and other works of fiction (e.g., Cawkell, 1997;Maker, 2008), public libraries and fiction (e.g., Carrier, 1965;Snape, 1995;Williams, 1988), and bibliotherapy (e.g., Brewster, 2008, andSturm, 2003 [thanks to Michael Buckland for this useful suggestion]).…”
Section: Information Science and Reading Fictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Few information science researchers have explored fiction, but those who have include Ross (1999), Rothbauer (2004 and, Ross et al (2006), Agosto & Hughes-Hassell (2010 and Thelwall & Kousha (2017). Additional information science research exploring fiction include work about information behavior and affect (e.g., the chapters in Nahl & Bilal, 2007, especially McKechnie et al), so-called confessional methods in information behavior research (e.g., Davenport, 2010), materials challenged in libraries (e.g., Pattee, 2008), and "the pleasurable" and fiction (Kari & Hartel, 2007). There is also a literature on fiction as the particular object of search (e.g., Ooi & Liew, 2011;Anna & Pertti, 2017), on the difficulties of cataloging and intellectual control of more creative works especially novels and other works of fiction (e.g., Cawkell, 1997;Maker, 2008), public libraries and fiction (e.g., Carrier, 1965;Snape, 1995;Williams, 1988), and bibliotherapy (e.g., Brewster, 2008, andSturm, 2003 [thanks to Michael Buckland for this useful suggestion]).…”
Section: Information Science and Reading Fictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite these expansions in the research area of information behavior in a broad array of fields, however, serious research attention to the role of fiction as an informative genre is rare in information studies. Exceptions can be found, for example, in the notable works of Rothbauer () and Sheldrick‐Ross () as described above, as well as in the research streams exploring information behavior and affect (e.g., the chapters in Nahl & Bilal, 2006), materials challenged in libraries (e.g., Pattee, ), and “the pleasurable” and fiction (Kari & Hartel, ). There is also a literature on fiction as the particular object of search (e.g., Ooi & Liew, ) or the difficulty of exercising intellectual control over fiction (see below for more on this theme).…”
Section: Why Has Information Studies Generally Ignored Fiction?mentioning
confidence: 99%