1996
DOI: 10.1016/0169-8141(96)00018-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Considering performance shaping factors in situation-specific human error probabilities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other researchers have also identified task load and fatigue as performanceshaping factors affecting basic human error probabilities and performance. [4][5][6][7] Descriptive research of medication errors supports these conclusions. Based on interviews with 41 doctors who committed 44 prescribing errors in a teaching hospital, Dean et al 8 revealed that in 31 instances (70%), the interviewees identified workload as a condition that contributed to the error.…”
supporting
confidence: 62%
“…Other researchers have also identified task load and fatigue as performanceshaping factors affecting basic human error probabilities and performance. [4][5][6][7] Descriptive research of medication errors supports these conclusions. Based on interviews with 41 doctors who committed 44 prescribing errors in a teaching hospital, Dean et al 8 revealed that in 31 instances (70%), the interviewees identified workload as a condition that contributed to the error.…”
supporting
confidence: 62%
“…Human factors have been repeatedly evidenced to affect human performance (Chang & Yeh, 2010;Park & Jung, 1996) and are "major determiners of human error" (Park & Jung, 1996, p330). Knowledge of the impact of human factors on human performance and error is therefore critical in addressing safety incidents in air traffic control.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Please see Aalipour et al (2016) for a short review of more HRA examples. The basic functions of most HRA methods are: (1) to find human errors associate with the operation, (2) predict the likelihood of occurrence, and (3); if necessary, reduction of their likelihood (Park and Jung 1996). Quantitative approaches to human error are mostly concerned with human error probabilities, which, according to Bell and Holroyd (2009), is defined as depicted in Equation 1:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%