2019
DOI: 10.1002/capr.12284
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Considering methodological integrity in counselling and psychotherapy research

Abstract: Within the field of counselling and psychotherapy research, qualitative methods have been a longstanding tradition of inquiry due to the mutual interest of therapists and researchers in both internal experiences and intersubjective processes. Methodological integrity is a conceptual framework that has been advanced to increase the rigor of these methods. In this paper, we consider the value of this concept for counselling and psychotherapy researchers and reviewers. This framework guides investigators and revi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(21 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The group project was co-constructive in nature in that writing, reviewing, and revising followed an iterative process. Input on the final document was triangulated across the writing team, independent qualitative research experts, and discussions at various conferences (Levitt, 2015b;Levitt, Bamberg, Josselson, & Wertz, 2016;Levitt, Morrow, Wertz, Motulsky, & Ponterotto, 2014;Levitt, Motulsky, Wertz, Josselson, & Ponterotto, 2015) with professional audiences interested in qualitative research and then was submitted for review. As such, the authors of this report believe that its content can speak equally well across methodologies as well as to both seasoned and novice qualitative researchers and reviewers.…”
Section: Task Force Aims and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The group project was co-constructive in nature in that writing, reviewing, and revising followed an iterative process. Input on the final document was triangulated across the writing team, independent qualitative research experts, and discussions at various conferences (Levitt, 2015b;Levitt, Bamberg, Josselson, & Wertz, 2016;Levitt, Morrow, Wertz, Motulsky, & Ponterotto, 2014;Levitt, Motulsky, Wertz, Josselson, & Ponterotto, 2015) with professional audiences interested in qualitative research and then was submitted for review. As such, the authors of this report believe that its content can speak equally well across methodologies as well as to both seasoned and novice qualitative researchers and reviewers.…”
Section: Task Force Aims and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Qualitative methodologies can move beyond reporting behavioral or observational measurement and toward better understanding of clients' experiences, client-created meanings, and factors that influence the complex internal and experiential world that occurs within (and outside of) the therapeutic and educational settings (Levitt et al, 2019). Qualitative methodologies can help clinicians tease apart what is happening inside and outside of counseling sessions by deciphering ambiguous quantitative findings (Miller & Daly, 2013), exploring how clients make meaning of different experiences (e.g., counseling intervention, group process, classroom guidance, psychoeducation), identifying the supports and barriers clients encounter that may have impacted outcomes (Miller & Daly, 2013), unearthing additional outcomes or changes that may have occurred (outside of that which was expected), and contributing to better understanding of societal and clinical structures related to power and oppression (Levitt et al, 2019). When connected to process-and outcome-based research, qualitative methodologies help us recognize aspects of the change process that influenced treatment completion (or early termination), moments in the therapeutic process that were central to change, or parts of the process or relationship that may have led to a specific outcome (Watson & McMullen, 2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Combining process-and outcome-based foci allows researchers to investigate how the events, actions, and experiences within sessions affect client changes throughout counseling (Llewelyn et al, 2016). Understanding how qualitative methodologies can be used in identifying patterns and gaining understanding of clients' experiences in counseling can lead to improvements in clinical practice and therapeutic interventions (Levitt et al, 2019).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Both quantitative and qualitative methods are included. From a qualitative research viewpoint, Lewitt, Morrill, and Collins (2020) introduce the concept of methodological integrity as applicable to qualitative research on counselling and psychotherapy. This concept is becoming established as a standard for qualitative research, particularly in the North American context, so this paper is an opportunity to introduce the concept to UK and international readers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%