2001
DOI: 10.1080/07418820100094871
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Considering hierarchical models for research on inmate behavior: Predicting misconduct with multilevel data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

18
252
3
12

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 211 publications
(285 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
18
252
3
12
Order By: Relevance
“…The literature clearly demonstrates that prison environments are heterogeneous. 28,43 Our research is consistent with this literature. An individual's risk of sexual victimization is not equivalent across prisons even within a single prison system.…”
Section: Sexual Violence Inside Prisons: Rates Of Victimizationsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The literature clearly demonstrates that prison environments are heterogeneous. 28,43 Our research is consistent with this literature. An individual's risk of sexual victimization is not equivalent across prisons even within a single prison system.…”
Section: Sexual Violence Inside Prisons: Rates Of Victimizationsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…For example, we found that whites were more involved in prison misconduct, a finding that is contrary to the findings of prior research (Harer & Steffensmeier, 1996;Poole & Regoli, 1980Wooldredge, Griffin, & Pratt, 2001). Perhaps the current findings are due to the relative homogeneity of the sample (e.g., rural, mostly white men).…”
contrasting
confidence: 57%
“…Ce type d'analyse permet de tenir compte du contexte, qui varie d'un individu à un autre. De plus, d'un point de vue statistique, lorsque les données sont hiérarchiquement structurées, il a été démontré que l'application de modèles multiniveaux est supérieure aux modèles plus « traditionnels » à un seul niveau (Goldstein, 1987 ;Byrk et Raudenbush, 1992 ;Van Der Leeden, 1998 ;Wooldrege et al, 2001). Ce type d'analyse se distingue en outre par sa fl exibilité, puisqu'il ne requiert pas un nombre équivalent d'observations pour chacun des individus (Dupéré et al, 2007).…”
Section: Stratégie D'analyseunclassified