2008
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-92698-6_12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Considering Context and Users in Interactive Systems Analysis

Abstract: Abstract. Although the take-up of formal approaches to modelling and reasoning about software has been slow, there has been recent interest and facility in the use of automated reasoning techniques such as model checking [5] on increasingly complex systems. In the case of interactive systems, formal methods can be particularly useful in reasoning about systems that involve complex interactions. These techniques for the analysis of interactive systems typically focus on the device and leave the context of use u… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The approach covers the three aspects we are considering: in (Campos and Harrison 2011), the approach is used to model the functional core and user interfaces of an infusion pump; and assumptions about user behaviours are covered in (Campos and Harrison 2007), by strengthening the pre-conditions on the actions the user might execute.…”
Section: Campos Et Al (Portugal 1997-2015)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The approach covers the three aspects we are considering: in (Campos and Harrison 2011), the approach is used to model the functional core and user interfaces of an infusion pump; and assumptions about user behaviours are covered in (Campos and Harrison 2007), by strengthening the pre-conditions on the actions the user might execute.…”
Section: Campos Et Al (Portugal 1997-2015)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this framework, the properties are specified using the CTL (Computational Tree Logic) temporal logic, allowing the verification of usability and functional properties (Campos and Harrison 2008). Particularly, the following usability properties can be expressed: The approach is applied to several case studies (Campos and Harrison 2001;Harrison et al 2013), specifically, in safety-critical systems (e.g., healthcare systems (Campos 1999;Campos and Harrison 2009;Campos and Harrison 2011;Harrison et al 2015) and avionics systems (Campos and Harrison 2007;Doherty et al 1998;Sousa et al 2014)), showing that the approach scales well to real-life applications. Ausbourg et al (France, 1996 Modelling Another approach based on the York interactor model is proposed in (d 'Ausbourg 1998;d'Ausbourg et al 1998).…”
Section: Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The above analysis limits consideration by ignoring the function of the panel. In the style of [2] an alternative stategy would be to explore how the device enables the environment to reach a desired temperature. This property relates to the context of use of the device, the temperature of the environment, which is not present in the model.…”
Section: Extending the Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The question of the paper is how to analyze collective behavior of users in relation to a system prior to fielding the system. While formal models have been developed and explored that are relevant to modeling the interaction between an individual user and device in context (see e.g., [8,9]) and general behavior of users have been captured through normative task models (see e.g. [10,20]) the impact of modeling collective behaviors within interactive systems have not been studied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%