The basic problem in Planarian regeneration, i.e., the origin of blastema cells, has been tackled by means of a karyological investigation carried out on a triplo-hexaploid biotype of Dugesia lugubris. The main characteristic of this biotype is that male germ cells are karyologically distinguishable from female germ cells and from the somatic cells.Sexually mature specimens were transected at a caudal level, posterior to the testes: from each transected specimen two regenerants were obtained, both of which formed a blastema. Thirty-six hours after the transection most of the metaphase cells of the anterior regenerant blastema (a.r.b.1 had 12 chromosomes. However, cells with 8 chromosomes as well as cells showing signs of chromosome elimination were also present. Three days after the transection only cells with 8 or 12 chromosomes could be detected in the a.r.b.The ultrastructural examination of the 36-hours-old a.r.b. revealed that some blastema cells display features which can be interpreted as indicating a process of dedifferentiation, the others being virtually undifferentiated. In the posterior regenerant blastema (p.r.b.1 of sexually mature specimens only cells with 12 chromosomes were present. The same applies to both the a.r.b. and p.r.b. of sexually immature specimens and to developing embryos. These findings suggest that in the sexually mature planarians studied, the blastema is formed mainly by triploid cells. However, in those regenerants which still possess testes, immature male germ cells can also contribute to the blastema formation. The possible role played by these male germ cells in the reconstitution of the missing tissues in the biotype studied is also discussed.One of the major problems in planarian regeneration concerns the nature and the origin of the cells which form the blastema. As is well known, the process by which the blastema is formed is currently explained according to two main theories. Several authors (cf., Wolff and Dubois, '47; Dubois, '49; Lender, '62; Brsndsted, '69) maintain that neoblasts -pluripotent, embryonic cells dispersed throughout the animal body -are the sole cell type responsible for regeneration. On the other hand, other workers (Steinmann, '08; Lang, '12; Hyman, '51; Woodruff and Burnett, '65; Rose and Shostak, '68; Hay, '68; Coward, '69) believe that, as a result of a regenerative stimulus, many specialized cells can J. EXP. ZOOL., dedifferentiate and migrate to the wounded region where they form the blastema. The missing tissues would then be reconstituted by redifferentiation of the dedifferentiated cells.Evidence obtained from several lines of experiment (for a recent survey on the subject, see Brsndsted, '69; Pedersen, '72; Gremigni, '74; Chandebois, '76) do not yet allow reconciliation of these two conflicting theories. It is possible that the mechanisms adduced by the two quoted theories to explain the formation of the blastema, i.e., the involvement of embryonic reserve cells or the dedifferentiation