2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.firesaf.2020.103065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Considerations on computational modeling of concrete structures in fire

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fracture energy to approximate the tension-stiffening effect was taken as 6000 N/m 2 . This value was chosen based on the considerations made by Nia and Gernay [26] to have a more robust numerical simulation. In this respect, the characteristic concrete tensile strength was lowered from 2.5 MPa, typical of a C40/50 concrete strength class, to 1 MPa.…”
Section: Shell Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fracture energy to approximate the tension-stiffening effect was taken as 6000 N/m 2 . This value was chosen based on the considerations made by Nia and Gernay [26] to have a more robust numerical simulation. In this respect, the characteristic concrete tensile strength was lowered from 2.5 MPa, typical of a C40/50 concrete strength class, to 1 MPa.…”
Section: Shell Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the data obtained through strength tests, the authors decided to evaluate the internal structure and how it changes when exposed to high temperatures. In recent years, this topic has been addressed, among others, in the context of fire safety in building structures [32,33]. In this context, it will be particularly important in structures such as road tunnels, for which evacuation conditions can be difficult [34] and for which much higher demands are made on the high temperature resistance of concrete.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…to achieve more realistic strength predictions compared to those by simplified sectional analysis. ABAQUS ( 2014) is frequently used in simulating the performance of separate structural components, while SAFIR is adopted for building simulations Gernay 2020a, Ni andGernay 2020b). Gao et al (2013), Kodur and Agrawal (2016) and Albrifkani and Wang (2016) proposed their own three-dimensional (3D) FE model in ABAQUS ( 2014) for predicting the thermal and mechanical performance of RC beams during fire exposure.…”
Section: Fe Modelling Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead of modelling individual structural elements, Ni and Gernay (2020a) and Ni and Gernay (2020b) use the software SAFIR to develop a 3D frame model for estimating the behaviour of entire RC building structures at and after a fire event. The model is able to consider effect of 3D restraint condition and continuity on structural responses.…”
Section: Fe Modelling Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation