Considerations of IP multicast for load balancing in Proxy Mobile IPv6 networks

Nguyen, Tien-Thinh; Bonnet, Christian

doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2014.07.008

Cited by 7 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Nguyen and Bonnet [21,22] introduce a solution mechanism to solve the issue of load balancing in the PMIPv6 by considering the IP multicast session. Their solution caters two scenarios, which are named as proactivemulticast and the reactive-multicast.…”

Section: Related Work On Pmipv6 Protocol Load Balancing Mechanismsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…However, in the latter, when the LMA becomes overloaded, the LMA starts to select some of the multicast sessions for a load balancing purposes. Then, the LMA selects the suitable target LMA for these sessions according to same criteria as specified in [21]. Their experiments and numerical results that have been conducted have shown significant improvements in terms of load distribution as well as reducing the multicast service disruption.…”

Section: Related Work On Pmipv6 Protocol Load Balancing Mechanismsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Load balancing mechanism for clustered PMIPv6 protocol

Ghaleb¹,

Subramaniam²,

Zukarnain³

et al. 2018

J Wireless Com Network

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Proxy Mobile IPv6 (PMIPv6) has become a credible member of pertinent research areas. This is attributed mainly to its capability of enabling mobility without imposing constraints or requirements on the mobile node (MN). This MN shield is enabled due to the transferring of mobility-related signaling to a new entity, which is called Mobile Access Gateway (MAG). However, associating MNs to a specific MAG inside the PMIPv6 network increases the MAG load probability. Thus, several research have enhanced the PMIPv6 protocol to improve its basic specifications and performance. Strategies include protocols, which apply the clustering technique to enhance the overall performance of the PMIPv6 in terms of routing, scalability, lifetime, and load balancing. The load balancing mechanism is considered in the non-clustered protocols. However, this mechanism has not been adopted in clustering-based protocols. Thus, pertaining to the load and the respective assignments is critical. In this article, to address these issues, a new load balancing mechanism is proposed among MAGs for Cluster-based Proxy Mobile IPv6 (CSPMIPv6) protocol. The signaling within the CSPMIPv6 has been enhanced to support the proposed load balancing mechanism. The proposed mechanism employs the inter-and intra-domain on a frequent basis to select the best MAG among the candidate MAGs. The new mechanism has improved the performance to create an evident improvement in terms of average queuing delay, handover latencies, transmission rate, end-to-end delay, and packet loss as compared to the LBM-PMIPv6 mechanism and CSPMIPv6 protocol.

show abstract

Section: Related Work On Pmipv6 Protocol Load Balancing Mechanismsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Related Work On Pmipv6 Protocol Load Balancing Mechanismsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Load balancing mechanism for clustered PMIPv6 protocol

Ghaleb¹,

Subramaniam²,

Zukarnain³

et al. 2018

J Wireless Com Network

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…So this multicast method was widely demanded by this Low power and Lossy Networks (LLNs) because energy and bandwidth were found as a major critical factors in this LLN [15]. The bandwidth and scalability advantage of multicast provide accurate solution for traffic reduction in mobile network and also allow the users to share the limited volume and frequency bands [16]. In WSN, the important aspect of multicast communication is to increase the efficiency of communication and minimize the communication overhead.…”

Section: Overview Of Multicast Ipmentioning

confidence: 99%

Multicast Communication using Different Group Key Managements

S¹,

Aithal²,

Shetty³

2019

IJRTE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract: The most appropriate communication mechanism for transfer of packets from one source to another is multicast IPv6 communication. Nowadays, multicast communication plays a major role in a large number of communication applications. In this multicast communication, the message privacy attains a highest position. The members of multicast are dynamic so they permit the host members to enter and depart the cluster without the permission of remaining group members and, it can't provide any transfer without the interference of host, this may reduce the performance. For security enhancement in multicast communication Group Key Management (GKM) was introduced.There are three different approaches in GKM and they were mainly involved to overcome the issues of host mobility in multicast communication. The challenges that are encountered by these GKM approaches their requirements and challenges was also discussed in this paper. Finally, some questions and their explanations were provided along with it. These GKM approaches will improve the privacy of multicast communication. So, the packets can deliver to the group members without any interference.

show abstract

“…Current related works on multicast PMIPv6 techniques are route optimization [20][21][22], global mobility [23], load balancing [24] and context transfer [25][26][27]. [20][21][22] use route optimization technique.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This technique is lack of intra domain support and the extra signals resulted in high signaling cost. [24] solves traffic issue at the LMAs. The LMA is liable for retaining the mobile node's accessibility state.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%