2019
DOI: 10.1186/s12940-019-0478-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Considerations in the use of different spirometers in epidemiological studies

Abstract: Background Spirometric lung function measurements have been proven to be excellent objective markers of respiratory morbidity. The use of different types of spirometers in epidemiological and clinical studies may present systematically different results affecting interpretation and implication of results. We aimed to explore considerations in the use of different spirometers in epidemiological studies by comparing forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV 1 ) and forced vital… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Third, we included patients that were assessed with two different types of spirometers, resulting in potential systematic differences between lung function measurements. 30 Finally, the interval between PFTs varied. In Korea, the national health insurance covers almost all Koreans, allowing patients to use medical services frequently and quickly.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, we included patients that were assessed with two different types of spirometers, resulting in potential systematic differences between lung function measurements. 30 Finally, the interval between PFTs varied. In Korea, the national health insurance covers almost all Koreans, allowing patients to use medical services frequently and quickly.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 16-year lung function measurements were performed using two different spirometers in two different centres for logistical reasons. We performed a comparison study in healthy volunteers using the two spirometers to establish a calibration equation which we used to correct for systematic differences 49. We observed very high correlation between measurements from the two spirometers (0.98–0.99); moreover, we do not expect exposure patterns to be different for measurements performed by either of the spirometers so that effect of using different spirometers is likely very small.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Seventeen spirometric indicators were registered by spirometric tests. Of these, three were analyzed in the present study: forced expiratory volume for 1 s (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC) and their percentage FEV1/ FVC (Tiffeneau index) [5,6].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%