Austenitic Stainless Steels - New Aspects 2017
DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.70939
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Considerations in the Design of Formable Austenitic Stainless Steels Based on Deformation-Induced Processes

Javad Mola

Abstract: The temperature dependence of tensile elongation in austenitic steels is discussed in view of the relationship between the stacking fault energy and deformation-induced processes. It is shown that the maximum tensile elongation is achieved in the vicinity of M d γ → α′ temperature. The influence of alloying elements on the temperature dependence of tensile elongation can therefore be analyzed with regard to their influence on the M d γ → α′ temperature. In this regard, majority of alloying elements including C… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The austenite lattice parameters in 0Al, 1.5Al and 3Al steels were calculated to be 0.35964 ± 0.8 × 10 −4 nm, 0.36059 ± 1.0 × 10 −4 nm and 0.36127 ± 0.7 × 10 −4 nm, respectively. On this basis, the addition of each wt.% Al results in an increase in the austenite lattice parameter by nearly 5.4 × 10 −4 nm, which agrees well with the authors’ previous studies [ 4 , 48 ] as well as with the results reported in [ 49 ]. Accordingly, as marked in Figure 4 by star symbols and the solid line passing through them, density reduction caused merely by lattice expansion of austenite accounts for nearly 31% of the total density reduction.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The austenite lattice parameters in 0Al, 1.5Al and 3Al steels were calculated to be 0.35964 ± 0.8 × 10 −4 nm, 0.36059 ± 1.0 × 10 −4 nm and 0.36127 ± 0.7 × 10 −4 nm, respectively. On this basis, the addition of each wt.% Al results in an increase in the austenite lattice parameter by nearly 5.4 × 10 −4 nm, which agrees well with the authors’ previous studies [ 4 , 48 ] as well as with the results reported in [ 49 ]. Accordingly, as marked in Figure 4 by star symbols and the solid line passing through them, density reduction caused merely by lattice expansion of austenite accounts for nearly 31% of the total density reduction.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In practice, an increase in the carbon concentration of austenite is expected to lower its strength further, by raising its stacking fault energy [ 86 ], and, thereby, its mechanical stability [ 87 ]. The deformation-induced martensite formation as an effective strain hardening mechanism is then delayed, resulting in a decrease in hardness [ 88 ]. The ready transformation of austenite with a low mechanical stability, on the other hand, enhances the strength.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies can be found on alloys, e.g. steel [11,12] or Co-based alloys [13,14], which revealed grain refinement beneath the surface, too. Recent tribological studies focus on the evolution of microstructural changes such as [9,13], but correlations of grain-size to properties e. g. strength or work-hardening are treated by material science studies: Studies on work-hardening behaviour due to grain size changes, as described for copper by [15], do not deal with grain refinement processes exhibited by tribological contacts.…”
Section: Copper-based Alloys As Tribomaterialsmentioning
confidence: 99%