2019
DOI: 10.1177/1540796918825479
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Considerations in Placement Decisions for Students With Extensive Support Needs: An Analysis of LRE Statements

Abstract: Special education consists of specially designed services available for students with disabilities, and should be available across placements. Students with the most significant disabilities continue to be taught in restrictive settings, despite accumulating evidence suggesting their special education services can be delivered effectively in general education settings. Every individualized education program (IEP) must contain a statement describing how the student will be provided a free and appropriate educat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

2
29
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the school district’s procedural manual had clear guidelines for IEP team placement decision-making, the actual decisions made seemed to be dependent on who was on a child’s IEP team. Similar to the results found by Brock (2018) and Kurth et al (2019), and based on their experiences, the district personnel surmised that this might be due to various IEP teams’ perceived ability or inability to support the student in the general education setting and, in some cases, parents and teachers who thought their children would be “safer” or “get more intensive services” in a separate setting. Historically, there seemed to have been some district team members who understood the evidence from the research, and valued inclusive schooling for all students, whereas many other district team members did not.…”
supporting
confidence: 66%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…While the school district’s procedural manual had clear guidelines for IEP team placement decision-making, the actual decisions made seemed to be dependent on who was on a child’s IEP team. Similar to the results found by Brock (2018) and Kurth et al (2019), and based on their experiences, the district personnel surmised that this might be due to various IEP teams’ perceived ability or inability to support the student in the general education setting and, in some cases, parents and teachers who thought their children would be “safer” or “get more intensive services” in a separate setting. Historically, there seemed to have been some district team members who understood the evidence from the research, and valued inclusive schooling for all students, whereas many other district team members did not.…”
supporting
confidence: 66%
“…We had only the IEP documents with notes, descriptions of students, assessments, and other data. IEPs can be quite varied related to how much is written down and documented related to many different decisions (Kurth et al, 2019). In addition, we did not “test” the students to verify the accuracy of the levels of performance as described in the students’ last IEPs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Studies conducted after the reauthorization of the 2004 IDEA suggest that the issue of congruence among identified needs, goals, and services delivered remains a concern (see Catone & Brady, 2005; Hoover et al., 2019; Hott et al., 2019). In addition, the types and settings of service offerings may not be individualized (Kurth et al., 2019a, Kurth et al., 2019b). Although 15 districts were included in the study, within‐district patterns were present, and there appeared to be little differentiation among both goals and services included in student IEPs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%