1989
DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(89)90170-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Considerations in measurement of marginal fit

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
456
1
50

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 599 publications
(515 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
8
456
1
50
Order By: Relevance
“…Lack of adequate fit is potentially detrimental to both the tooth and the supporting periodontal tissues, due to cement solubility or plaque retention. 17 However, the definitions of marginal fit vary considerably among investigators and often the same term is used to refer to different measurements, or different terms are used to refer to the samemeasurements. 17 In the present study the marginal gap was determined according to terminology previously reported by…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Lack of adequate fit is potentially detrimental to both the tooth and the supporting periodontal tissues, due to cement solubility or plaque retention. 17 However, the definitions of marginal fit vary considerably among investigators and often the same term is used to refer to different measurements, or different terms are used to refer to the samemeasurements. 17 In the present study the marginal gap was determined according to terminology previously reported by…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Holmes et al 17,23 Overcontours or undercontours of the crowns margins were not evaluated in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Holmes et al 36 defined the internal gap as the perpendicular measurement from the internal surface of the casting to the axial wall of the preparation; the same measurement at the margin was referred to as the marginal gap. The internal gap between the printed resin coping and stone die for each sectioned specimen was measured at 5 defined locations: (A) facial chamfer, (B) facial midaxial, (C) incisal, (D) lingual midaxial, and (E) lingual chamfer (Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2), 한 시편당 4군데, 두 그룹의 시편 20 개를 총 80회에 걸쳐 변연 간격을 측정하였다. 모든 측정부 위는 지대치 모형으로부터 시편까지 수직적인 거리로 변연 간격을 정의하며 측정하였다 9,10) (Fig. 3).…”
Section: ) 변연 간격 측정unclassified