2022
DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.1495
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Considerations for Use of Propensity Score Matching in Specific Patient Populations

Abstract: culated MEAF score on this subset of 70 patients is consistent with early allograft dysfunction analysis, indicating that preservation using OCS liver resulted in significantly lower MEAF scores within the overall subset (mean [SD], 3.45 [1.71] vs 4.90 [2.02]; P = .002) as well as for donation after circulatory death donors (mean [SD], 2.87 [1.96] vs 5.94 [1.40]; P = .009) when compared with the control group.That the OCS group contained a higher number of donation after circulatory death donors was the resul… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To address the imbalance of potential confounders between the two groups, we matched treatment groups using propensity scores matching (PSM) [ 8 ]. The propensity score was estimated as the predicted probability of a patient being in the CC or CS group from a logistic regression model.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address the imbalance of potential confounders between the two groups, we matched treatment groups using propensity scores matching (PSM) [ 8 ]. The propensity score was estimated as the predicted probability of a patient being in the CC or CS group from a logistic regression model.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%