2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2019.03.070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Considerations for readdressing theoretical descriptions of particle-reinforced composite food gels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding is consistent with that of (Gravelle, Marangoni & Barbut, 2017) who reported a decrease in cooking loss in chicken meat protein gels with increasing glass particle concentration. The effect was more pronounced for smaller particles in previous studies (3–6 μm), and higher particle concentrations were necessary for larger particles, which was partly related to a higher surface area but it has also been shown that larger particles are more efficient in structuring protein gels at high ionic strengths compared with smaller particles (Gravelle et al, 2019; Gravelle, Marangoni & Barbut, 2020). In the present study, IGPs in the size range of 1–50 μm were used, which reflected more, but not perfectly, the size FBPs (Figs 5 and 6).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This finding is consistent with that of (Gravelle, Marangoni & Barbut, 2017) who reported a decrease in cooking loss in chicken meat protein gels with increasing glass particle concentration. The effect was more pronounced for smaller particles in previous studies (3–6 μm), and higher particle concentrations were necessary for larger particles, which was partly related to a higher surface area but it has also been shown that larger particles are more efficient in structuring protein gels at high ionic strengths compared with smaller particles (Gravelle et al, 2019; Gravelle, Marangoni & Barbut, 2020). In the present study, IGPs in the size range of 1–50 μm were used, which reflected more, but not perfectly, the size FBPs (Figs 5 and 6).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…All rights reserved matrix) can increase the gel strength, whereas passive fillers (i.e. low/no adhesion to the gel matrix) may also weaken the gel structure (Gravelle et al, 2019). More recently, it was shown that also hydrophilic particles (that were suggested to act mainly as a passive filler especially at high ionic strengths) facilitate a structural reinforcement in meat protein gels by binding water in the dispersed phase and thus preventing the formation of microchannels during heating.…”
Section: Accepted Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The values of E c presented in Table 1 , Table 2 , Table 3 are reported as a function of volume fraction filler content (φ f = 0–0.5), and are separated based on the ionic strength (0, 100, and 200 mM added NaCl) and filler size employed (4 μm, 7–10 μm, 45–90 μm, and 150–210 μm). The addition of NaCl was used to induce changes in the microstructural organization and mechanical properties of the resulting gel [2] (also, see associated research article [1] ).…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 15 ] This feature arises from the higher effective volume fraction of monodisperse microgels, defined as the ratio of the volume fraction and the maximum packing fraction, that is caused by the lower maximum packing fraction. [ 16 ] Last, small microgels offer a better printing fidelity than their larger counterparts. [ 17 ] However, if not contained within a percolating hydrogel matrix, the resulting 3D printed granular hydrogels are soft because adjacent microgels are weakly or sparsely connected.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%