2008
DOI: 10.1029/2008wr007122
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Considerations for measuring pressure head and water content in inclined boreholes

Abstract: Angled boreholes have been proposed to improve water content and pressure head monitoring in deep vadose zones by reducing the impact of the borehole on measurements by placing sensors below undisturbed soil. However, the borehole casing distorts the flow field, which may impact measurements made with sensors placed on or in the boreholes. We examined a wide range of soil types, background fluxes, and casing radii and angles of inclination to predict the error in water content and pressure head measurements th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A detailed description of the FTDR probes, including application in field studies, calibration procedure, and data interpretation, has been presented previously (Dahan et al, 2007, 2008; Rimon et al, 2007). Nevertheless, a recent study indicated that TDR probes installed on top of an impermeable casing in slanted boreholes, similar to the FTDR installation procedure that was used in this study, could potentially overestimate measured water content values under dynamic flow conditions (Warrick and Knight, 2002; Hinnell and Ferré, 2008). Accordingly, the measured water content values presented here may overestimate the actual water content in the sediments away from the probe.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…A detailed description of the FTDR probes, including application in field studies, calibration procedure, and data interpretation, has been presented previously (Dahan et al, 2007, 2008; Rimon et al, 2007). Nevertheless, a recent study indicated that TDR probes installed on top of an impermeable casing in slanted boreholes, similar to the FTDR installation procedure that was used in this study, could potentially overestimate measured water content values under dynamic flow conditions (Warrick and Knight, 2002; Hinnell and Ferré, 2008). Accordingly, the measured water content values presented here may overestimate the actual water content in the sediments away from the probe.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…A comprehensive description of the FTDR probes, including application in field studies, calibration procedure, and data interpretation, was presented by Rimon et al (2007) Recently, Hinnell and Ferré (2008) showed that under dynamic flow conditions, TDR probes installed on top of an impermeable casing in inclined boreholes can potentially overestimate the measured water‐content values. Because a similar installation procedure and TDR probes were used in this study, it is possible that the water‐content values measured in this study overestimated the actual water content during the dynamic phase of the infiltration process.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because a similar installation procedure was used in this study, the measured values of water content and water pressure presented here could potentially be overestimates of the actual water content in the undisturbed sediments away from the impermeable barrier. According to Hinnell and Ferré (2008), however, and under the water content and pressure conditions measured in this study, this overestimation is not expected to exceed the actual water content values by more than 1%. During rare high‐flux wetting events, water content overestimation could reach up to 3%.…”
Section: Study Sitementioning
confidence: 46%
“…Hinnell and Ferré (2008) reported that the use of an impermeable casing in inclined boreholes can potentially create denser flow lines in the upper part of the instrument. As such, water‐content measurements above this upper part under dynamic flow conditions might produce overestimations.…”
Section: Study Sitementioning
confidence: 99%