2021
DOI: 10.3390/fire4030050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Considerations for Categorizing and Visualizing Numerical Information: A Case Study of Fire Occurrence Prediction Models in the Province of Ontario, Canada

Abstract: Wildland fire management decision-makers need to quickly understand large amounts of quantitative information under stressful conditions. Categorization and visualization “schemes” have long been used to help, but how they are done affects the speed and accuracy of interpretation. Using traditional fire management schemes can unduly restrict the design of new products. Our design process for Ontario’s fine-scale, spatially explicit, daily fire occurrence prediction (FOP) models led us to develop guidance for d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, many machine learning classification tools require training data where the response variable is balanced and many ML models for FOP are not properly calibrated to produce true probabilities because the subsampling of nonfire events for training data leads to overprediction (Phelps & Woolford, 2021a). Canadian statistical scientists have played a key role here to ensure that properly calibrated models—whether they are model‐based or algorithm‐based methods—are employed, that they are properly assessed, and that the interpretability of the various approaches is discussed with fire management practitioners should the goal be operational implementation (Phelps & Woolford, 2021b) where visualization of model output plays a key role (Boychuk et al, 2021).…”
Section: The Forestsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, many machine learning classification tools require training data where the response variable is balanced and many ML models for FOP are not properly calibrated to produce true probabilities because the subsampling of nonfire events for training data leads to overprediction (Phelps & Woolford, 2021a). Canadian statistical scientists have played a key role here to ensure that properly calibrated models—whether they are model‐based or algorithm‐based methods—are employed, that they are properly assessed, and that the interpretability of the various approaches is discussed with fire management practitioners should the goal be operational implementation (Phelps & Woolford, 2021b) where visualization of model output plays a key role (Boychuk et al, 2021).…”
Section: The Forestsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This type of patterning can occur as a result of thunderstorms that have localized intense rainfall. The base colors for these schemes were obtained from Boychuk et al (2021). Categories : FWI values are binned and given a single solid color per classification.…”
Section: Case Study: Considerations In a Fire Weather Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the current approach taken by the Ministry when mapping FWI is a slight modification to the categories visualization schemes as described above. In addition to visualizing FWI according to four categories (Low, Moderate, High, Extreme), the numerical values of the FWI that are recorded at each weather station are plotted inside a 40 km radius circle centered at each station's location (see Boychuk et al, 2021, Figure 1b). The latter is done to visually convey to those using the map where they can be most confident in the values of the interpolated surface and provide the actual value of the FWI which are associated to different events and aid further in the interpretation (see Hanes et al, 2021, Table 3).…”
Section: Case Study: Considerations In a Fire Weather Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations