Considerations and guidance in designing equity-relevant clinical trials

Abstract

Health research has documented disparities in health and health outcomes within and between populations. When these disparities are unfair and avoidable they may be referred to as health inequities. Few trials attend to factors related to health inequities, and there is limited understanding about how to build consideration of health inequities into trials. Due consideration of health inequities is important to inform the design, conduct and reporting of trials so that research can build evidence to more effectively address health inequities and importantly, ensure that inequities are not aggravated. In this paper, we discuss approaches to integrating health equity-considerations in randomized trials by using the PROGRESS Plus framework (Place of residence, Race/ethnicity/culture/language, Occupation, Gender, Religion, Education, Socio-economic status, Social capital and “Plus” that includes other context specific factors) and cover: (i) formulation of research questions, (ii) two specific scenarios relevant to trials about health equity and (iii) describe how the PROGRESS Plus characteristics may influence trial design, conduct and analyses. This guidance is intended to support trialists designing equity-relevant trials and lead to better design, conduct, analyses and reporting, by addressing two main issues: how to avoid aggravating inequity among research participants and how to produce information that is useful to decision-makers who are concerned with health inequities.

Sex/gender and additional equity characteristics of providers and patients in perioperative anesthesia trials: a cross-sectional analysis of the literature

“…Clinical evidence based on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) often guides healthcare decisions in many countries around the world [1,2]. Although RCTs provide evidence on the impact of healthcare interventions, potential differences within and between population subgroups tend to be overlooked in the design, conduct, and analysis of RCTs [3][4][5]. For example, guidelines recommend treating severe carbon monoxide poisoning with hyperbaric oxygen therapy regardless of any health equity-related characteristics (e.g., sex, gender, education, ethnicity).…”

Recruitment and retention of the participants in clinical trials: Challenges and solutions

“…Hence, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) should be integrated with health equity considerations. [ 5 6 ]…”

The art of science for mental health research

“…Furthermore, for public health preventive campaigns, trials may not alone be sufficient to estimate the optimal duration and dosage of interventions 3 . Trials to address equity also need tailoring and appropriate trial design 4 . The Medical Research Council guidelines for the development of complex interventions have revolutionised trial design, 5 but variation in exposures to local health and social systems and naturalistic assets such as health campaigns, community actions, parks and non-governmental organisations, if not fully considered, may differentially undermine the detection of any differences between the new intervention and comparison arms of a trial 6 .…”