2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2011.02.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consideration of uncertainties in seismic analysis of non-classically damped coupled systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, knowledge of correlations does not ensure that the randomly sampled sets of natural frequencies will remain as ordered sets. Tadinada shows that explicit consideration of correlation coefficients between the natural frequencies may not ensure correct sampling unless the frequencies are perfectly correlated. The frequencies of a structure are perfectly correlated if and only if the uncertainty in the structure is dominated by a single parameter, which is not usually the case.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, knowledge of correlations does not ensure that the randomly sampled sets of natural frequencies will remain as ordered sets. Tadinada shows that explicit consideration of correlation coefficients between the natural frequencies may not ensure correct sampling unless the frequencies are perfectly correlated. The frequencies of a structure are perfectly correlated if and only if the uncertainty in the structure is dominated by a single parameter, which is not usually the case.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The evaluation of the joint density function would be simplified if the joint density function is assumed to be centrally symmetric. In the case of two modes with closely‐spaced frequencies, the assumption of central symmetry appears reasonable because the frequencies tend to be strongly and positively correlated . The assumption, however, would not hold when the two frequencies are negatively correlated.…”
Section: Formulation For Joint Probability Density Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%