1999
DOI: 10.1006/cres.1999.0178
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consideration of the genus Ginkgoites Seward and a redescription of two species from the Lower Cretaceous of Germany

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Jurassic records in southern South America of Ginkgoites or other ginkgoalean foliage types have not been found to date, as a result of either preservation or taphonomy; this is in marked contrast to the abundant and well-preserved forms of the same age that have been recovered from the northern latitudes (Watson et al 1999;Guignard and Zhou 2005;Yang et al 2008;Nosova et al 2011).…”
Section: Leaf Cuticle Anatomy and The Ultrastructure Of Ginkgoites Timentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Jurassic records in southern South America of Ginkgoites or other ginkgoalean foliage types have not been found to date, as a result of either preservation or taphonomy; this is in marked contrast to the abundant and well-preserved forms of the same age that have been recovered from the northern latitudes (Watson et al 1999;Guignard and Zhou 2005;Yang et al 2008;Nosova et al 2011).…”
Section: Leaf Cuticle Anatomy and The Ultrastructure Of Ginkgoites Timentioning
confidence: 90%
“…We assigned the leaf to the fossil morphogenus Ginkgoites because of its clearly ginkgoalean affinity, based on its unmistakable morphology and shape, and because the vegetative material is sparse and fragmentary (one specimen only). We hereby follow Watson et al (1999), Ash (2010), and Villar de Seoane et al (2015). However, we refrain from formally introducing a new species because epidermal anatomy, which is a feature necessary to clearly identify ginkgoalean species and to separate Ginkgo from Ginkgoites, and fertile organs are unavailable so far.…”
Section: Genus-ginkgoites Sewardmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Florin (1936a) extended this to include epidermal and morphological anatomical characteristics: "Fossil Ginkgo-like leaves, in which epidermal anatomy or major anatomical characters are unknown or considerably different to leaves of modernday Ginkgo biloba, are assigned to Ginkgoites" (p. 105). Watson et al (1999) recommended, after careful reconsideration of the history of the fluctuating nomenclature of ginkgoalean leaves, a "return to the use of Ginkgoites Seward" (p. 721) for sparse and /or fragmentary vegetative material that is clearly of ginkgoalean affinity. A similar approach was deployed by Ash (2010) and Villar de Seoane et al (2015).…”
Section: Genus-ginkgoites Sewardmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since most ginkgoalean fossils are vegetative organs, especially leaves that exhibit considerable heterogeneity and morphological variation, it is always difficult to know what kinds of reproductive structures they are really related with (Zhou 1997). For instance, although a large number of Ginkgo fossils have been reported, most were based solely on leaves, and there have been diverse opinions about their identification (Seward 1919;Harris 1935;Florin 1936a,b;Harris et al 1974;Zhou and Zhang 1989;Czier 1998;Watson et al 1999). We therefore referred only species of vegetative organs of which their reproductive organs are known, to natural genera here, while those whose reproductive organs are unknown are transferred to morphogenera (form genera), e.g.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%