2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125178
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consideration of rainfall intermittency and log-normality on the merging of radar and the rain gauge rain rate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Dorim stream basin is primarily observed by the Gwanaksan Meteorological Radar. This radar is an S‐band single‐biased Doppler radar with an antenna altitude of approximately 640 m, antenna diameter of 8.5 m, observation radius of approximately 240 km, and effective radius of approximately 120 km, enabling ultra‐short‐term rainfall prediction in the Dorim stream basin (Ha et al, 2015; Ro & Yoo, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Dorim stream basin is primarily observed by the Gwanaksan Meteorological Radar. This radar is an S‐band single‐biased Doppler radar with an antenna altitude of approximately 640 m, antenna diameter of 8.5 m, observation radius of approximately 240 km, and effective radius of approximately 120 km, enabling ultra‐short‐term rainfall prediction in the Dorim stream basin (Ha et al, 2015; Ro & Yoo, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In rain gauge-derived rainfall, the variance was the largest in the SB of Event 3 among all cases. Tese results showed that radar-derived rainfall has a smaller spatial deviation than rain gauge-derived rainfall [45]; however, the amount of rainfall is small [46,47] because the radar observes raindrops in the atmosphere, but as droplets fall, observation loss may occur in the rain gauge depending on weather conditions. Te amount of ER calculated using the diference in CAR between the two boxes was similar to that of the radar and rain gauge.…”
Section: Determination Of the Taermentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Despite the introduction of remote observation instruments, such as radar and satellites, generating quantitative rainfall data remains challenging because of uncertainty arising from the di culties in observations over mountains and oceans (Tesfagiorgis et Studies have attempted to merge radar and ground observations or use machine learning to generate quantitative rainfall data (Tang et al 2018;Shin et al 2019;Ro and Yoo 2020). These research showed that how important to secure accurate ground observation data for precise analysis of water resources and water cycle.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%