2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.patcog.2006.05.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consideration of illumination effects and optimization of window size for accurate calculation of depth map for 3D shape recovery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
61
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given this local behaviour, a certain depth regularity of the observed surface is implicitly assumed. On the one hand, the considered neighborhood has to be as small as possible to guarantee an approximately constant depth within itself and therefore to avoid too much "smoothing" the restoration process around sharp depth slopes and even depth discontinuities (Malik & Choi, 2007). On the other hand, it has to be as large as possible both to always capture focus cues (i.e.…”
Section: Neighborhood-based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given this local behaviour, a certain depth regularity of the observed surface is implicitly assumed. On the one hand, the considered neighborhood has to be as small as possible to guarantee an approximately constant depth within itself and therefore to avoid too much "smoothing" the restoration process around sharp depth slopes and even depth discontinuities (Malik & Choi, 2007). On the other hand, it has to be as large as possible both to always capture focus cues (i.e.…”
Section: Neighborhood-based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A formula used for the suggested operators are given in (5) and (6). The operators are used to find the optimal focused window by measuring the highest response resulted by the operator.…”
Section: Proposed Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many FM operators have been proposed in the literature for both autofocus (AF) and SFF applications [5]. In [6], the performance of multiple FM operators were examined. FM operators can be classified into two broad types: space domain and, frequency domain [7] [8], and others such as compression operators [5] [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The selection of r is a trade-off between robustness to noise and spatial resolution [16] and is, hence, application-dependent. A radius r = 9 has experimentally been defined in this work.…”
Section: A Focus Measurementioning
confidence: 99%