2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jconhyd.2014.05.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consideration of grain packing in granular iron treatability studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
(84 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, increasing the kinetics of these processes would extend the applicability of Fe 0 filters by decreasing the remediation time. Progress in understanding the relative importance of key operational parameters (particle size and particle size distribution, particle shape, thickness of the filter, water flow velocity) was also not satisfactorily [12,13]. For example, it is still not established that pure Fe 0 filters (100% Fe 0 ) are not sustainable [13] because volumetric expansion of all Fe 0 particles implies that complete clogging is just a matter of time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, increasing the kinetics of these processes would extend the applicability of Fe 0 filters by decreasing the remediation time. Progress in understanding the relative importance of key operational parameters (particle size and particle size distribution, particle shape, thickness of the filter, water flow velocity) was also not satisfactorily [12,13]. For example, it is still not established that pure Fe 0 filters (100% Fe 0 ) are not sustainable [13] because volumetric expansion of all Fe 0 particles implies that complete clogging is just a matter of time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hundreds of articles contain expressions like 'to the best of the author's knowledge' in the introduction to rationalize the investigation of things that are known for more than one century [33][34][35]77,78]. Moreover, several authors have put various arguments forward to maintain that Fe 0 is an environmental reducing agent despite controversial views [8,[46][47][48][49][50][51][52]. This attitude runs the risk of derailing the project of establishing the science of Fe 0 remediation.…”
Section: Undermining the Scientific Knowledge-building Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rationale for their reported sustainability does not seem to have been discussed yet. Based on these observations and evidences that alternative views have been constantly refuted [8,[46][47][48][49][50] or belittled [51,52]. It is fair to argue that the Fe 0 remediation research has progressed on an unsustainable path [53].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the usefulness of mixing Fe 0 and inert (anthracite, pumice, sand) or reactive but non-expansive (Fe3O4, MnO2, TiO2) materials is still controversially discussed [125,127,128]. Furthermore, an empirical approach has been used to screen selected operational factors like grain sizes and grain size distributions [126], grain packing [129] or the mixture of Fe3O4 and external Fe II solutions [88][89][90]. This empirical approach is certainly costly but not necessarily effective [121][122][123].…”
Section: /H2o Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%