The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting, 2004.
DOI: 10.1109/pes.2004.1373254
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consideration of an appropriate TTC by probabilistic approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While in step 4 of the proposed solution algorithm, a particle with the best fitness sharing will instead take the position to guide the swarm into the next generation. And, accordingly, due to that the objective of the MDCP is to maximize the loading factor, with the fitness sharing of each particle calculated by (11), (13) and (14), the gbest in step 4 of the proposed solution algorithm is determined as follows: gbest = the pbest of the particle with the best fitness sharing (15) The setting of σ is determined on a basis of system case-by-case; in the study, with a certain number of simulations, the effects of various σ values to achieve the optimal solution are carefully inspected for the test systems.…”
Section: Proposed Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While in step 4 of the proposed solution algorithm, a particle with the best fitness sharing will instead take the position to guide the swarm into the next generation. And, accordingly, due to that the objective of the MDCP is to maximize the loading factor, with the fitness sharing of each particle calculated by (11), (13) and (14), the gbest in step 4 of the proposed solution algorithm is determined as follows: gbest = the pbest of the particle with the best fitness sharing (15) The setting of σ is determined on a basis of system case-by-case; in the study, with a certain number of simulations, the effects of various σ values to achieve the optimal solution are carefully inspected for the test systems.…”
Section: Proposed Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under a competitive environment, in [11], for reactive power devices installation, a tangent vector based loss sensitivity analysis was performed to indicate which buses are most necessary for reactive compensation. With the TCSC and UPFC installations and based on specific generation pattern, in [12] and [13], a sensitivity-based repetitive linear iterative approach (SRLIA) optimization algorithm was used to improve control performance and enhance real-time loadability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to reduce linearization errors, load flows should be performed periodically. Probabilistic methods have considered the uncertainties of the system performance that could not be addressed in a deterministic way, and have been implemented to evaluate the TTC for various outages [5][6][7]. As all power system networks and the system components are exposed to nature, they are affected by the weather condition considerably, and the failure rates of transmission lines are increased due to weather conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many different methodologies have been applied for transfer capability studies and popular methods include: repeated power flow (RPF) [2,3]; continuation power flow (CPF) [4][5][6][7]; optimal power flow (OPF) [8,9]; DC load flow utilizing linear sensitivity factors [10]; and also some probabilistic approaches etc [11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%